Help with background blur for basketball shots
Nappalonia
Registered Users Posts: 96 Big grins
Hello dgrinners, I need your help with blurring the background on some shots I took at the Bull's game. I read the sticky's on sports shooting and I think I did ok with exposure, but I should have used a longer lens, oh well. :rolleyes
I gave it a try but I can't quite get it right, I attempted to make a selection and use gaussian blur for the background, but my photoshop skills are pretty limited. :scratch
http://nappalonia.smugmug.com/gallery/1150414/1/53654958
Thanks for helping.
I gave it a try but I can't quite get it right, I attempted to make a selection and use gaussian blur for the background, but my photoshop skills are pretty limited. :scratch
http://nappalonia.smugmug.com/gallery/1150414/1/53654958
Thanks for helping.
http://nappalonia.smugmug.com/gallery/580776
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
20D :clap
Canon
18-55
85 1.8 :wink
Tamron
28-75 2.8
Sigma
70-300 DG APO Macro
30 1.4:thumb
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
20D :clap
Canon
18-55
85 1.8 :wink
Tamron
28-75 2.8
Sigma
70-300 DG APO Macro
30 1.4:thumb
0
Comments
Be sure to read the beginning of the thread as well.
These days, I'd also consider the techniques here: http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=22331
Here's the mask
and here's the result
—Korzybski
The ball, Crawford, the ball!
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
(And can we call you Crawford?)
OUCH!
—Korzybski
My Wife just calls me HEY YOU. But sure.
The mask: two, actually. First mask out the players (and THE BALL!). Save as channel. Then in a second channel add the gradient. I placed two gray points of equal value in it to create that extended gray band. A continuous gradient caused the Lens Blur to deal with the front row of the audience weirdly, blurring their heads more than their feet. Then I selected the first channel and filled black into the gradient.
It works best with objects that are crisp. Fuzzy edges, and fuzzy masks to capture them, get a little funky. It's sometimes necessary to clone out sharp edges where a few pixels from the background didn't get blurred.
—Korzybski
But it still looks artificial. It's not your work, edge, I just think the shot doesn't lend itself to this kind of post-induced artificial depth of field.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Yeah, I used the most misnamed tool in the Photoshop arsenal: the Quick Mask (yeah, right.)
Lens Blur isn't used enough, in my opinion. Not sure how it works, but it's not quite the same as using a mask to govern the intensity of the blur, like with a Gaussian blur. It's an entirely different algorithm. But there are virtually no halos. The only setting that means much to me is the radius; perhaps some of you photographers can make sense of the others.
—Korzybski
For those with broadband, here's a link to a movie: http://av.adobe.com/russellbrown/HocusPocusFocusSM.mov
http://www.twitter.com/deegolden
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
20D :clap
Canon
18-55
85 1.8 :wink
Tamron
28-75 2.8
Sigma
70-300 DG APO Macro
30 1.4:thumb
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
I've watched the movie twice now... Russell makes it look so easy, doesn't he?
You should watch the movie he has in Tips and Techniques on replacing a background. I still can't figure out the masking technique he's using and I've written down notes. Somewhere I'm missing something.
If anyone here understands that tutorial, it would make a great step by step tutorial on dgrin.
http://www.twitter.com/deegolden
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au