Canon 3000D?

chrisjlee

hmm more rumors

http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/reviews/canon/canon_eos_3000d.php

http://www.infodigitalcamera.com/blog/127/canon-3000d-leaked-information/

DanielB

chrisjlee wrote:

hmm more rumors

http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/reviews/canon/canon_eos_3000d.php

http://www.infodigitalcamera.com/blog/127/canon-3000d-leaked-information/

i would rather go with a 30D than buy that hunk-o-plastic

chrisjlee

DanielB wrote:

i would rather go with a 30D than buy that hunk-o-plastic

I agree. I think its actually going to be the 35D. the D30 already exists.



and i love my 10D. I would like to see myself with a 20D sometime this summer or next xmas.

DanielB

chrisjlee wrote:

I agree. I think its actually going to be the 35D. the D30 already exists.

no, i mean the old version.

i would rather buy it than that hunk of plastic.

Red Bull

If this is true, then that looks like one cheap camera. I wouldn't even consider buying it!

HeldDown

I'd like to point out that on the second page, it refers to the camera as the "3000D" every time except once -- randomly calling it the "350D." Looks as if a photochopper missed a bit.

ScottMcLeod

HeldDown wrote:

I'd like to point out that on the second page, it refers to the camera as the "3000D" every time except once -- randomly calling it the "350D." Looks as if a photochopper missed a bit.

That, and the Rebel 3000 was an actual model, which looked EXACTLY like that POS photoshop job.

This one is bullshit. The 35D may not be, but I don't suspect either of being accurate.