Answered before?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2d3/1d2d370f5b745b02c89de69a4311c4deececccde" alt="digdon1"
This may be redundant but, are the vast majority of pix posters experienced users of post-production tools (ex. Photoshop, Corel Pro, etc.?) It would seem that you don't stand a chance of doing credible work unless you have your degree in post-pro. BTW, I'm band new to this forum and feel way behind on the tricks of the trade, so to speak.
:dunno
Digdon1
:dunno
Digdon1
0
Comments
I think you'll find that many folks here are pretty good with Photoshop. But they're even better with their cameras
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
No degree required. Now doing graphics is a different ball of wax entirely.
http://photos.mikelanestudios.com/
Thanks Andy. I've had a Fuji FinePix A340 P & S for about a year. Recently purchased a NikonD50 which is a blast!
Thanks again,
Digdon!
Digdon1
That being said, some kinds of shooting mandate some degree of post-processing. For example, folks who shoot in RAW pretty much have to apply some sharpening, curves and saturation - in other words, do the work that the camera sensor would typically apply to a jpeg, but not to a RAW, before saving it.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Hmmm, I should do that for my 20D too:D
http://photos.mikelanestudios.com/