Is my son an alien?

StevenVStevenV Registered Users Posts: 1,174 Major grins
edited February 14, 2006 in People
I noticed that the light on the ceiling of our front hallway cast an interesting pattern, so I had my son stand in the "right" place and shot a few frames.

98723779_f1ab6b1f0a.jpg
larger version at http://static.flickr.com/21/98723779_f1ab6b1f0a_o.jpg
Canon EOS 10D, 2006:02:10 23:19. Shutter: 0.7 sec, Aperture: 6.7, ISO: 100.
Exposure mode: Av, Flash: External E-TTL, Metering mode: Evaluative
Lens: 28 to 80mm, Focal length: 43mm
CFn 15: Shutter curtain sync: 2nd-curtain sync


It's not a great picture by any stretch of the imagination, and I welcome comments and critique, but specifically I noticed something.

Here are two 100% crops. I was focused on his eye, and it looks reasonably sharp.

crw1386eye4bn.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2871/crw1386eye4bn.jpg

The top of his head, though, looks blurry as though I'd moved the camera - certainly possible with that slow a shutter speed but then why don't I see that in the eye? At f6.7 I wouldn't have expected that narrow a DoF.

crw1386head1th.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/5605/crw1386head1th.jpg

Did I move?
Is it an artifact of the bright light behind him?
Am I mistaken about DoF w/that f-stop?
Is his head naturally blurry around the edges? :):
Are there aliens in our midst?

Whaddya think?

Comments

  • StevenVStevenV Registered Users Posts: 1,174 Major grins
    edited February 12, 2006
    StevenV wrote:
    Did I move?

    After further review, I think that was the case. This is from the same set, different camera settings. Faster shutter, no blur.

    98852324_93a5ccc597_o.jpg
    Canon EOS 10D, 2006:02:10 23:17.
    Shutter: 1/60 sec, Aperture: 4, ISO: 100
    Flash: Auto, Focal length: 43mm
  • David_S85David_S85 Administrators Posts: 13,237 moderator
    edited February 12, 2006
    Cool demonstration with that ceiling lamp.

    Your son is not an alien. Real aliens absorb light rather than scatter or reflect light. :uhoh
    My Smugmug
    "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
  • rahmonsterrahmonster Registered Users Posts: 1,376 Major grins
    edited February 12, 2006
    Wow that reminds me of paintings of angels in churches. Very coolthumb.gif
    www.tmitchell.smugmug.com

    Art washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life...Picasso
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,934 moderator
    edited February 12, 2006
    What a cool trick!

    Try the coffee filter WB trick. Using a white filter, take a shot and use it to
    set the custom WB. Then re-shoot.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited February 13, 2006
    ian408 wrote:
    What a cool trick!

    Try the coffee filter WB trick. Using a white filter, take a shot and use it to
    set the custom WB. Then re-shoot.
    OK, I'll bite. What's "the coffee filter WB trick"?ne_nau.gif

    Thanks
  • StevenVStevenV Registered Users Posts: 1,174 Major grins
    edited February 13, 2006
    I believe he's talking about it as a cheap, easily portable, "known white" with which to set custom WB.
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,934 moderator
    edited February 13, 2006
    OK, I'll bite. What's "the coffee filter WB trick"?ne_nau.gif

    Thanks

    If you've heard of an Expodisc, this is roughly equivalent and much cheaper
    and is used to set a white balance.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • iyacyasiyacyas Registered Users Posts: 13 Big grins
    edited February 14, 2006
    ian408 wrote:
    If you've heard of an Expodisc, this is roughly equivalent and much cheaper
    and is used to set a white balance.

    Great.....couldn't you have posted this before I bought mine? :):


    /.m
  • HeldDownHeldDown Registered Users Posts: 255 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2006
    If you can find an old Pringles lid -- the ones that are semi-opaque, not clear -- they are an even more effective Ghettexpodisc than the coffee filters! mwink.gif
    imageNATION
    SEEING THE WORLD IN A WHOLE NEW LIGHT...
    http://www.imag-e-nation.net
  • JamokeJamoke Registered Users Posts: 257 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2006
    Back on Topic
    To address the original question - what caused the detail and the blur.

    I'm a 3D guy. Everything that I analyze, I analyze with all the spacial locations in mind. My take is that it was the shutter speed, and that either you or he rotated with the eye as the centerpoint of rotation. So either he sat up in his chair, while rotating his face forward... Or you rotated by moving the camera either up or down, and exactly compensated by rotating about his eye, or the center of the picture. ne_nau.gif

    Nice picture though. good little puzzler.
    Mine: Canon 20D, 50 f1.8 II, 28-105 II, 70-200 f2.8L, T 70-300 Macro, T 2X expander, 12-24 Sigma
    Hers: Sony SR10, (Soon Canon 5D MKII), 85 f1.8, 28-135 USM, Stroboframe, Manfrotto NeoTec
    Ours: Pair of 580 EX, Lensbaby, Studio Alien Bees, Son & TWO Daughters
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,934 moderator
    edited February 14, 2006
    HeldDown wrote:
    If you can find an old Pringles lid -- the ones that are semi-opaque, not clear -- they are an even more effective Ghettexpodisc than the coffee filters! mwink.gif

    But you'd have to buy a can of pringles to get that. The coffee filters
    can be ripped off from work(sux) :D
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
Sign In or Register to comment.