critique on critique style

bwgbwg Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,119 SmugMug Employee
edited February 18, 2006 in SmugMug Support
i think critique style is very cool.

however i'm not thrilled with how everything to the left of the exif info is hot (meaning clickable). Just the photo should trigger lightbox, not the entire left 2/3 of the box.

it's just a big pain if i have something like an IM window that opens up on top of the browser window, and i'll click the browser window to get focus back there and lightbox pops up. That's expected behavior if i click on the photo, but not when i click next to the photo.

not a biggie, but just sayin.

edit: this is really only evident with portrait orientated photos
Pedal faster

Comments

  • flyingdutchieflyingdutchie Registered Users Posts: 1,286 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2006
    bigwebguy wrote:
    i think critique style is very cool.

    however i'm not thrilled with how everything to the left of the exif info is hot (meaning clickable). Just the photo should trigger lightbox, not the entire left 2/3 of the box.

    it's just a big pain if i have something like an IM window that opens up on top of the browser window, and i'll click the browser window to get focus back there and lightbox pops up. That's expected behavior if i click on the photo, but not when i click next to the photo.

    not a biggie, but just sayin.

    edit: this is really only evident with portrait orientated photos
    This is what you see on FireFox only, right?
    On IE this does not happen for me.
    The problem is that there is an <a> element surrounding the <img> element. This <a> element, for some reason extends (invisibly) way beyond the <IMG> element, especially noticable when the image has a vertical (portrait) orientation.

    This is how i fixed it:
    #critique .photo a {
    /* Make the surrounding <a> really hidden */
    visibility: hidden;
    }
    #critique .photo a img {
    /* But show the part where the actual image is */
    visibility: visible;
    }

    This fixes the issue on FireFox but it does not mess up IE.
    I can't grasp the notion of time.

    When I hear the earth will melt into the sun,
    in two billion years,
    all I can think is:
        "Will that be on a Monday?"
    ==========================
    http://www.streetsofboston.com
    http://blog.antonspaans.com
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2006
    I've reported to JT, let's see what he has to say.
  • {JT}{JT} Registered Users Posts: 1,016 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2006
    Sorry - in fixing the ie flicker problem I had to switch the onlcick to an a tag. This should be fixed in the upcoming patch.
  • mbradymbrady Registered Users Posts: 321 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2006
    {JT} wrote:
    Sorry - in fixing the ie flickr problem I had to switch the onlcick to an a tag. This should be fixed in the upcoming patch.
    Freudian slip there? mwink.gif
  • {JT}{JT} Registered Users Posts: 1,016 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2006
    doh, I have used the word flickr twice now to describe problems on dgrin :(
    mbrady wrote:
    Freudian slip there? mwink.gif
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited February 18, 2006
    bigwebguy wrote:
    edit: this is really only evident with portrait orientated photos


    Bug fixes!

    http://blogs.smugmug.com/release-notes/2006/02/18/bug-fixes-february-18th-2006/
Sign In or Register to comment.