Does my new 20D have a high iso problem?
I was trying some pretty extreme exposures the other night to get a feel for what this camera is capable of. I don't like the look of the noise here at all.
50% crop
original cropped slightly to 600x400
No postprocessing done, these are straight from the camera jpegs. It's not the fact that there IS noise (it's iso3200 for crying out loud), but the regular horizontal pattern to it. I got the same thing doing some longer exposure (~8s) astrophotos earlier this month. Does the fact that the exposure is way off have anything to do with it? These shots weren't done with an accompanying RAW file, so I can't compare the two. Your thoughts?
50% crop
original cropped slightly to 600x400
No postprocessing done, these are straight from the camera jpegs. It's not the fact that there IS noise (it's iso3200 for crying out loud), but the regular horizontal pattern to it. I got the same thing doing some longer exposure (~8s) astrophotos earlier this month. Does the fact that the exposure is way off have anything to do with it? These shots weren't done with an accompanying RAW file, so I can't compare the two. Your thoughts?
panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
tristansphotography.com (motorsports)
Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
Sony F717 | Hoya R72
tristansphotography.com (motorsports)
Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
Sony F717 | Hoya R72
0
Comments
Having said that, it is MUCH nicer than the ISO3200 on the 300D, which had a noticeable GRID pattern on it.
SEEING THE WORLD IN A WHOLE NEW LIGHT...
http://www.imag-e-nation.net
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
tristansphotography.com (motorsports)
Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
Sony F717 | Hoya R72
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
I don't see it getting worse than that. As mentioned, you will see banding at high ISOs on occassion. You will see it more in the oof and under exposed areas of the shot. You will really see it if you brighten/push these shots during post processing.
The good thing is that is usually isn't noticeable at ISO3200 (sometimes I see it at lower ISOs too). Especially with a decently lit/exposed subject
Steve
3200 ISO is a bit of a stretch and I wouldn't ask any camera to perform well at that extreme. I have a very good DSLR which does very well at 1600 ISO but I couldn't realistically ask it for anything more. Perhaps your expectations are a bit high.
View the un-altered JPG version of the CRW file here:
http://matthewsaville.smugmug.com/gallery/261021
And, on another note, check out my latest test comparison that has the D70 "VS" the 20D in high ISO performance here:
http://matthewsaville.smugmug.com/gallery/1223029
Here's a screenshot of my 20D CRW conversion of an ISO 1600 file:
Take care,
-Matt-
My SmugMug Portfolio • My Astro-Landscape Photo Blog • Dgrin Weddings Forum