Going WIDE
XO-Studios
Registered Users Posts: 457 Major grins
To go with my D70, I already have the following glass
Nikon 80-200/2.8D AF-S
Nikon 50/1.8
Nikon 18-70mm
I am looking to go superwide or even fisheye
I am considering the following:
Tamron 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 XR DI II LD Aspherical (IF) AF Zoom
Sigma 10mm - 20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Nikon 10.5mm f/2.8 ED-IF DX Autofocus Fisheye
Can anyone elaborate a little on this. My original thought is to go with the 10.5 Nikon, but in reality I am just startig the process of selection/elimination.
XO,
Nikon 80-200/2.8D AF-S
Nikon 50/1.8
Nikon 18-70mm
I am looking to go superwide or even fisheye
I am considering the following:
Tamron 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 XR DI II LD Aspherical (IF) AF Zoom
Sigma 10mm - 20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Nikon 10.5mm f/2.8 ED-IF DX Autofocus Fisheye
Can anyone elaborate a little on this. My original thought is to go with the 10.5 Nikon, but in reality I am just startig the process of selection/elimination.
XO,
You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
Mark Twain
Some times I get lucky and when that happens I show the results here: http://www.xo-studios.com
Mark Twain
Some times I get lucky and when that happens I show the results here: http://www.xo-studios.com
0
Comments
The 10.5 is a different beast than the two zooms - fisheyes tend to be specialty lenses.
I've heard that the Sigma is soft a pretty much any aperture... I've heard awesome stuff about the tokina 12-24 (have a few sample shots from a camera store demo on another system... I'll try to remember to post some tomorrow.)
Also, for 3x more than the tokina, you can't beat the 12-24mm f/4 nikkor.
As for the tamron... haven't seen much about it. I'd check pbase for samples.
I'd agree that the 10.5 is a different type of lens. You either go with the fish-eye distortion and work that into the artistry of your shot or you defish the result with software after shooting and when you clip the result to get it back to a rectangle, you end up with substantially less than 10.5mm.
I've been comparing the Sigma 10-20, Tokina 12-24 and Nikon 12-24 myself. I'm about to pull the trigger and get the Sigma 10-20. Here are some threads that discuss those lenses:
Sigma 10-20 vs. Nikkor 12-24 - summary and your thoughts?
Which one would you buy? Tokina vs. Sigma
Please rate: Tokina 12-24 vs. Sigma 10-20
Alternative to Sigma 10-20 - fisheye?
Sigma 10-20 or 12-24
Nikon 12-24, Tamron 11-18 or Sigma 10-20
Sigma 10-20 or Tokin 12-24
Is Sigma 10-20 that bad? Tamron 11-18 that good?
Homepage • Popular
JFriend's javascript customizations • Secrets for getting fast answers on Dgrin
Always include a link to your site when posting a question
I knew that the 10.5 was a different animal, the similarity was in my budget.
After seeing the pictures in this link:
Alternative to Sigma 10-20 - fisheye?
I am very tempted to get the 10.5 now, and the 12-24 Nikon later.
Thanks for all the input.
XO,
Mark Twain
Some times I get lucky and when that happens I show the results here: http://www.xo-studios.com
I just press the button and the camera goes CLICK. :dunno
Canon: gripped 20d and 30d, 10-22 3.5-4.5, 17-55 IS, 50mm f1.8, 70-200L IS, 85mm f1.8, 420ex
sigma: 10-20 4-5.6 (for sale), 24-70 2.8 (for sale), 120-300 2.8
smugmug: www.StandOutphoto.smugmug.com