Focusing problems
JimM
Registered Users Posts: 1,389 Major grins
I purchased a used Sigma 400mm f5.6 off of FM a couple of weeks ago. Because it is older and it only works wide open (at f5.6) the guys sold it to me for a great price.
Here is my problem: it seems to auto-focus just fine, but when I look closely through the viewfinder, the image is soft. I took some test shots, and sure enough, soft. Now the first time I did this it was like 15 degrees (F) outside, so I thought, well maybe somehow the warm lens caused the cold air to condense (I know, not really possible, but I hoped :dunno). So I went outside today upper 40's and sunny and tried test shots... again they look soft, but this time I tried manual focusing the lens too and I found the lens can get sharp. So here is my question:
Has anyone else ever noticed this (were manual is sharper)? Is there a solution? Is somehow the lens elements out of alignment for the focus? Any suggestions (aside from using this strictly as a MF lens)?
Here is my problem: it seems to auto-focus just fine, but when I look closely through the viewfinder, the image is soft. I took some test shots, and sure enough, soft. Now the first time I did this it was like 15 degrees (F) outside, so I thought, well maybe somehow the warm lens caused the cold air to condense (I know, not really possible, but I hoped :dunno). So I went outside today upper 40's and sunny and tried test shots... again they look soft, but this time I tried manual focusing the lens too and I found the lens can get sharp. So here is my question:
Has anyone else ever noticed this (were manual is sharper)? Is there a solution? Is somehow the lens elements out of alignment for the focus? Any suggestions (aside from using this strictly as a MF lens)?
Cameras: >(2) Canon 20D .Canon 20D/grip >Canon S200 (p&s)
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
0
Comments
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
No, just the auto focus when using this particular lens is not sharp. MF seems pretty good for the price of the glass.
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
Phoenix, AZ
Canon Bodies
Canon and Zeiss Lenses
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
I have just sent Sigma an email about the problem to see what they say. I will keep you posted on what their response is. In the meantime, if anyone has any ideas or suggestions on why it auto focuses soft, but will manual focus sharp (it is very close, just an extremely minor move to get it sharp), please let me know.
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
Just received this (extremely fast) email from Sigma (looks canned to me)...
Thank you for your inquiry.
Unfortunately our older lenses have compatibility problems with some newer Canon cameras.
We regret to inform that your lens 400mm F5.6 is not compatible and can not be upgraded.
If you live in U.S., we have a 'trade-in' for lenses that can not be upgraded.
Please contact us at 1-800-896-6858 for more information (Monday through Friday, 9AM to 5 PM EST).
We apologize for the inconvenience.
I will try to call them tomorrow morning, but I have a feeling that the "trade-in" is not a large amount of money toward a new lens.
I still think it is strange how the auto focus is just slightly off and only on my 20D. If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
Prices for these:
300mm trade-in price was $2,031 (said it retails for $3,600, B&H has it for $2,600 )
500mm trade-in price was $3,229 (said it retails for $5,400)
So I think their trade in price is very good, unfortunately, I am not looking to spend a couple of grand on a lens right now.
So, like I said, I think Sigma is at least giving me a pretty reasonable trade-in on some new glass!
Maybe I can find another Sigma that I would be interested in and see what the trade-in price would be.
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
I must admit that I am impressed that Sigma would give you that kind of discount on a trade in. I think that lens worked fully on a D60 you should find one and see if it will AF.
Phoenix, AZ
Canon Bodies
Canon and Zeiss Lenses
I was just looking at the 14mm 2.8 myself - $750. Wonder what they'd give it to you for?
Okay... calling anyone with a D60 near the Detroit area... make yourself known! Anyone, anyone? Let's meet up and see if it works.
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
B&H has the 14mm for $849, so if I had to guess based on the other math, I would say $721.
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
I am trying to check out there site, but it is painfully slow to me.
Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes
Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos