an open ended Q. on how to improve....

nosmo

so - I'm looking for input on what I can do to enhance my flower pics. I have some basic
adjustment functionality in photoshop elements 2 (when it's not crashing...:wxwax) so within this
limitation (and a general bewilderment) what should be happening with or to the shots...
idea's from "try <blah> , to "stop harrassing those poor flowers" are welcome.

pic 1: f5.6, 1/60, ex comp -1 1/3, iso 100


pic 2: f7.1, 1/20, ex comp 0.0, iso 100


ref pic of 'Le Studio et facilties'


camera: Canon 20D w/24-70 f2.8 lens

thanks for lookin' and any advice/comments

steve

GREAPER

Wow, They look pretty good to me.

TristanP

Not much wrong with them in general. One suggestion - watch your backgrounds. You can use black posterboard or foamcore, for example in your first pic on the left side, to block distracting backgrounds.

Also, they seem maybe a bit soft, but that could be personal preference. Are you doing any sharpening?

Dee

Pretty good
I agree with what Tristan posted...

I prefer the first photo, would have preferred it a little sharper, more depth of field? the composition is OK, but nothing spectacular.

I think the problem may be your lighting -- and perhaps a slight different composition...

Nothing wrong with your photo, but you asked for input, I agree you could improve it a little and using Tristan's suggestions and looking for perhaps more dramatic lighting and a different composition somehow, you'd be a bit happier.

I spent hours looking for "rough" ideas, and after over 200 photos decided I didn't have a single thing...

I too strugle with orchid photos...but I have to go to the local nursery to photograph mine, and I can't control the lights like you can...

nosmo

Thanks for the input

GREAPER wrote:

Wow, They look pretty good to me.

Thanks Greaper

TristanP wrote:

Not much wrong with them in general. One suggestion - watch your backgrounds. You can use black posterboard or foamcore, for example in your first pic on the left side, to block distracting backgrounds.

Also, they seem maybe a bit soft, but that could be personal preference. Are you doing any sharpening?

TristanP - they do look soft. The focal point was generally just inside the lip of the flower,
and of all the shots I took these came out looking the best. I'm using a 24-70 lens about
4 - 6 inches away from the subject to fill the viewfinder... but it does make the pics come
out a little soft overall.
I'm surprised the backgrounds came out looking as well as they did,
and you are right I need to do something better.

Dee wrote:

I agree with what Tristan posted...

I prefer the first photo, would have preferred it a little sharper, more depth of field? the composition is OK, but nothing spectacular.

I think the problem may be your lighting -- and perhaps a slight different composition...

Nothing wrong with your photo, but you asked for input, I agree you could improve it a little and using Tristan's suggestions and looking for perhaps more dramatic lighting and a different composition somehow, you'd be a bit happier.

I spent hours looking for "rough" ideas, and after over 200 photos decided I didn't have a single thing...

I too strugle with orchid photos...but I have to go to the local nursery to photograph mine, and I can't control the lights like you can...

Composition, I'm hoping will come with experience (I hope...), I used the 'unsharp mask'
filter - and maybe it's me but, I did not see much change with these. Something to fuss with
along with the 'Sharpen' filter. As well as the lighting...

Dee, since you live in the bay area did you consider going the the
San Francisco Pacific Orchid Exposition last week? I thought about it but work pointed me back
in the correct direction.

Thanks for the comments

steve

Dee

Orchids

nosmo wrote:

Dee, since you live in the bay area did you consider going the the
San Francisco Pacific Orchid Exposition last week? I thought about it but work pointed me back
in the correct direction.


steve

No, I didn't... I went to the Conservacy of Flowers to see their orchid exhibit but it was so hot and humid, I was wilted by the time I got to that room. They were misting every few minutes too! I wasn't too thrilled with my photos, or I'd make up an album.

I see you're East Bay. I live on the coast. On weekends Shelldance is open, I believe 10 to 5. It's free to visit. It's in Pacifica, two towns south of San Francisco on the coast.

Here's their website: http://www.shelldance.com/contactdirections.html

They are camera friendly, and I asked if I could use a tripod, and the reply was as long as I didn't get in the way of other visitors. Before or after the greenhouse visits, you could hike up the trail to. I don't walk very much, so I haven't been hiking up that hill, but I hear it's a nice hike.

Depending on how far you are, it might be worth a visit -- come before June, before the fog socks in and ruins the light! I can give you some other places to visit if you want to make a day of it.

BigAl

The biggest problem I think you're having is DoF. You can see from these two, that even at F16, I'm still a bit short.





As you can see from the shadows, I used a flash mounted to the left of the lens to get sufficient light.

Aydelette

diffuser
Try playing with a diffuser. You'll be delighted.

Regarding depth of field, decide on your audience. If you wish to very carefully illustrate the structure of an orchid, you'll need more. If you are shooting for a more idiosyncratic result ("a" word avoided by me), something to echo the exotic nature of your subject, you might even try for less. I agree that right now, you're at a less than satisfying depth of field.

On the other hand you are getting very pleasing detail and texture.

AK

nosmo

Dee wrote:

No, I didn't... I went to the Conservacy of Flowers to see their orchid exhibit but it was so hot and humid, I was wilted by the time I got to that room. They were misting every few minutes too! I wasn't too thrilled with my photos, or I'd make up an album.

I see you're East Bay. I live on the coast. On weekends Shelldance is open, I believe 10 to 5. It's free to visit. It's in Pacifica, two towns south of San Francisco on the coast.

Here's their website: http://www.shelldance.com/contactdirections.html

They are camera friendly, and I asked if I could use a tripod, and the reply was as long as I didn't get in the way of other visitors. Before or after the greenhouse visits, you could hike up the trail to. I don't walk very much, so I haven't been hiking up that hill, but I hear it's a nice hike.

Depending on how far you are, it might be worth a visit -- come before June, before the fog socks in and ruins the light! I can give you some other places to visit if you want to make a day of it.

Thanks Dee - I'll check them out the next time I can get over to your side.

BigAl wrote:

The biggest problem I think you're having is DoF. You can see from these two, that even at F16, I'm still a bit short.

What lens would you be using? I was wondering if a Macro lens would be better...?

Aydelette wrote:

Try playing with a diffuser. You'll be delighted.

Regarding depth of field, decide on your audience. If you wish to very carefully illustrate the structure of an orchid, you'll need more. If you are shooting for a more idiosyncratic result ("a" word avoided by me), something to echo the exotic nature of your subject, you might even try for less. I agree that right now, you're at a less than satisfying depth of field.

On the other hand you are getting very pleasing detail and texture.
AK

hmmmm. even more to think about. I like the idea of accentuating the exotic with less DOF.
Right now it's just sort of inbetween .....

Thanks all for the comments

steve

BigAl

nosmo wrote:

What lens would you be using? I was wondering if a Macro lens would be better...?

I use a Sigma 105mm macro lens for close-up work.

swintonphoto

There have been a lot of good suggestions so far in this thread. My only suggestion to add is to try positoning the flowers in a different place in the frame. Often without thinking I place items right in the middle of the frame, only realizing later that had I moved it to one side of the frame the whole composition would have been more interesting. So, try moving the focal point of the flower out of the center of the frame.