What's your monitor temp in Kelvin?
wxwax
Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
The tutorial for my ancient Eye One monitor calibrating software recommends a Kelvin temp on 5000.
That sure is warm.
I see on Wikipedia that sRGB is 6500, which is considerably cooler and brighter, is considered the norm for monitors working with photos and the web.
That sound right to you? What's your Kelvin?
That sure is warm.
I see on Wikipedia that sRGB is 6500, which is considerably cooler and brighter, is considered the norm for monitors working with photos and the web.
That sound right to you? What's your Kelvin?
General computer-users should set their PC monitor color-temperature to "sRGB" or "6500K", as this is what digital cameras, web graphics, and DVDs etc are normally designed for. Indeed the sRGB standard stipulates (among other things) a 6500K display whitepoint.
Sid.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
0
Comments
I know that is what my Spyder2Pro sets up as the default, when I calibrate my monitor.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
OK, seriously... also 6,500K. In addition, my monitor also has an sRGB mode where temp, contrast and brightness are all preset for viewing photos. I have no idea if that mode is what a monitor spyder thingie would suggest, but it looks good enough to my old eyes.
I use another personal preset for everything else, as sRGB is way too bright for anything but editing photos.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
I had initially calibrated my PB to 6500k, but had found it to be too warm and yellowish in comparison to that of the LCD monitor when viewing pictures of the same type in the same color space. Only after calibrating it to 7100k , could i achieve a relatively close match
Is this fine?
I had to download the update and do the calibration in a shuttered room on an overcast day. Doing it by the dim bulb of a light did not give me good results.
So my Kelvin is spot-on at 6500, and my Luminance is at 99.2% While I was balancing the separate RGB channels, the Luminance stayed a wee bit low. I'm settling for 99.2% Luminance.
Sound right?
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
6500 at work... too bad the flourescent lighting gives everything its own cast
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
I've never done more that the OSX color calibration, so I don't know. I just know that I use 6500. I'm looking at that Huey, although I know you didn't like it....
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
6500 with brightness at 85%.
I'll sell you an unopened one for cheap.
But I have to tell the truth. After going through a proper (and painstaking!) calibration with the Eye One Display, including riding the separate RGB channels on my monitor, the final result is profoundly different to the Huey's, and makes much more sense to my eye.
That being said, if you want an unopened Huey for a bargain, I have one (Pantone website screwed up, didn't cancel my order, so I have two copies of a product I don't want.)
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Tim