CHallenge 59 - Stone Angels
harjtt
Registered Users Posts: 223 Major grins
I'd just like an opinion on these two shots - looks as if the best rough shots have already been taken!
Both taken today as I was heading home - hand held, ISO 100,
Pic 1. f5.2. 1/200
Pic 2 f2.8 1/500s
Which one would be ok for rough or may be neither of them ?
Cheers
:thumb:D
HarjTT
PS.. I'll try and post my entry a wee bit earlier for this one!
Both taken today as I was heading home - hand held, ISO 100,
Pic 1. f5.2. 1/200
Pic 2 f2.8 1/500s
Which one would be ok for rough or may be neither of them ?
Cheers
:thumb:D
HarjTT
PS.. I'll try and post my entry a wee bit earlier for this one!
0
Comments
I knew, of course, that trees and plants had roots, stems, bark, branches and foliage that reached up toward the light. But I was coming to realize that the real magician was light itself.
Edward Steichen
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
Hi Virginia, Thusie & wholenewlight
Thanks for the comments on the pic and I agree with you Virginia about the blown out part on the angels head in no.1. I wasn't sure if I should have used a flash to fill in but thought that would have changed the pic completely. I'll post a colour version of the same shot.
Cheers
Harj
#2 and good luck.
[SIZE=-1]It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. - John Lennon.[/SIZE]
Mr peas
Thanks for the tip with the odge tool, but i was stuck at work and couldnt get around to trying it out .
HarjTT
D