I've run into a situation where I need to do this and would rather not use SmugBrowser or any other thrid party app. Any way to do this natively in SM? What about via the API?
I've run into a situation where I need to do this and would rather not use SmugBrowser or any other thrid party app. Any way to do this natively in SM? What about via the API?
There is not, that's why Devbobo made SmugBrowser. I'm sorry you won't use it. You can also try Star *Explorer.
I've run into a situation where I need to do this and would rather not use SmugBrowser or any other thrid party app. Any way to do this natively in SM? What about via the API?
Why is it you don't want to use an existing third party app, but yet you inquire about the API such that you could build your own third party solution?
I've not used this particular API method myself, but the API has smugmug.albums.delete that says it can delete a gallery.
Why is it you don't want to use an existing third party app, but yet you inquire about the API such that you could build your own third party solution?
Because pre-built apps can cause some serious damage if they go screwy and delete the wrong gallery. I could lose days rather than just a few hours. And an 'oops, sorry' from SM would send me over the top. I can't risk it.
But I can use the api directly from a browser and know the execution is correct or incorrect right there. Sure, it will take time executing each item one by one. But it will still be faster than opening 600 albums and mousing around. I might be able to get wget to work and then I can just build a simple batch file.
I will also say that doing this from LR 3.3 has been an easy way for me to delete the galleries. Works well and I can vouch for Andy's comment I have had the heroes help with gallery management and it was easy and fast. Much faster than reuploading.
And how exactly is telling me that everything works perfect for everyone else helping me?
Samir, doesn't sound like you've tried SmugBrowser or Star Explorer, two options we presented to you. Sounds like you want to just build your own thing.
Samir, doesn't sound like you've tried SmugBrowser or Star Explorer, two options we presented to you. Sounds like you want to just build your own thing.
And it sounds like you avoided my question. I'll ask again. How exactly is telling me that everything works perfect for everyone else helping me?
And it sounds like you avoided my question. I'll ask again. How exactly is telling me that everything works perfect for everyone else helping me?
Hi Samir, you sound upset, I'm sorry - this is a circular discussion. I'm not trying to tell you that everything works perfect for everyone else. I (and others) were merely trying to point out that there are tools that work well to do what you want to do. I doubt anyone deletes more galleries than I and our heroes, and we love SmugBrowser for that purpose.
Hi Samir, you sound upset, I'm sorry - this is a circular discussion. I'm not trying to tell you that everything works perfect for everyone else. I (and others) were merely trying to point out that there are tools that work well to do what you want to do.
Yes, Andy I am upset. Because I'm tired of being made felt like, 'it's just you'. This has been done numerous times to me--on the image rotate issue, on ftp uploading, on SE crashing, on third-party tools, and more. And now here too.
My question was simple. Your answer was adequate, but not complete. John finished answering the question with the API information. I even explained why I didn't want to use third-party applications, and you guys still harped on that.
I know how buggy SM is as well as you guys do. I've been here far too long now to see that fiascos like the current issue with the 'arrange photos' tool is not the exception, but the norm. And because I don't want to be harmed by some rogue issue by not using tools that 'are fine for you', you want to make it seem like 'it's just me'?
I deal with people online every day just like you do--managing a community and dealing with people and their requests, concerns, and issues. I have customer service experience spanning over 30 years. I've know all the techniques used to sidetrack real problems, minimize real issues, and just attempt to make someone else out to the be the 'bad guy'. I've used them myself.
And I may be wrong, but I feel that I have been the target of these techniques numerous times. Maybe I bring it upon myself by not following the 'love it or leave it' rule. But I believe that if you truly care about something, you will say something and try to get something fixed if it's broken, like the image rotate tool.
I have the answer I need for the issue I came here for, and I've explained why I'm upset. Your move.
I have the answer I need for the issue I came here for, and I've explained why I'm upset. Your move.
I'm really sorry you are upset - I only tried to help, Samir. I read and reread this thread and all I said was "Many of us use SmugBrowser and StarExplorer without trouble. And our heroes could always undelete a mistakenly deleted album any time."
Thanks for talking it out, we only wish to help. I can assure you we don't treat you any differently than anyone else - we just want to help and try our best to answer your questions.
I'm really sorry you are upset - I only tried to help, Samir. I read and reread this thread and all I said was "Many of us use SmugBrowser and StarExplorer without trouble. And our heroes could always undelete a mistakenly deleted album any time."
Thanks for talking it out, we only wish to help. I can assure you we don't treat you any differently than anyone else - we just want to help and try our best to answer your questions.
I have to side with Samir on this, as I think I've felt what he's feeling. When we raise an issue, bug, want or need, it should be the last resort for you guys in support to refer us to outside tools or third party applications. It is obvious that deleting multiple galleries at once should be a function of SmugMug and not a browser extension or part of a paid third party app. I have had this same response to things like bulk geotagging, rotating and cropping. "Do it locally, much better" If you're a web-app, shouldn't you be striving to outshine the desktop?
I have to side with Samir on this, as I think I've felt what he's feeling. When we raise an issue, bug, want or need, it should be the last resort for you guys in support to refer us to outside tools or third party applications. It is obvious that deleting multiple galleries at once should be a function of SmugMug and not a browser extension or part of a paid third party app. I have had this same response to things like bulk geotagging, rotating and cropping. "Do it locally, much better" If you're a web-app, shouldn't you be striving to outshine the desktop?
Malte
Well, I also think in terms of "Malte wants something right now - what's available and how can it be done" If a tool exists, I'll show it to you. We can't create every tool/feature request that you come up with (though we do many!) and also things take time.
Well, I also think in terms of "Malte wants something right now - what's available and how can it be done" If a tool exists, I'll show it to you. We can't create every tool/feature request that you come up with (though we do many!) and also things take time.
I've found a fast way to do this without using the API. It's actually pretty simple. You can just use the direct url for deleting, and add the confirmation for deleting. This will immediately delete whatever gallery you specify and all its images. It's DANGEROUS if you make a mistake, but can be invaluable for times when you have to delete 300 galleries. I plan to make a batch file and feed it to wget. If anyone else wants to know how to do this, I'll elaborate.
Well, my script is running now. And the eta to completion is 5.1hrs to delete 1864 galleries.
wget wouldn't work since it required the login cookie, so I just made a massive batch file that uses start to execute the delete url, and ping to introduce a 10s delay to fully process each deletion. I'm sure an API method (or application) probably would've had an issue with this type of load. I didn't even think a simple batch file would take this long. Good think I worked on this today rather than later in the week.
If I would've spent even a minute manually clicking away on each gallery, it would've taken 1.29 days constantly working to delete this many galleries without automation.
I realize that this type of deletion scenario rarely happens, if ever, and probably pushes the design scope of the system, but a tool to help with multiple gallery deletion is definitely needed.
Comments
Hi wslam,
I'm pretty sure only one gallery can be deleted at a time.
David
SmugMug API Developer
My Photos
Thanks David.
This is kind of annoying. But thanks anyway
All the best,
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Thank you Andy,
I had the feeling it can't be done when Star Explorer does not have that option. Oh well.
Smugmug still rules!
How can you delete multiple galleries at one time?
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=30112
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=60800
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=118916
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=183884
I've run into a situation where I need to do this and would rather not use SmugBrowser or any other thrid party app. Any way to do this natively in SM? What about via the API?
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
There is not, that's why Devbobo made SmugBrowser. I'm sorry you won't use it. You can also try Star *Explorer.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
I've not used this particular API method myself, but the API has smugmug.albums.delete that says it can delete a gallery.
Homepage • Popular
JFriend's javascript customizations • Secrets for getting fast answers on Dgrin
Always include a link to your site when posting a question
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
But I can use the api directly from a browser and know the execution is correct or incorrect right there. Sure, it will take time executing each item one by one. But it will still be faster than opening 600 albums and mousing around. I might be able to get wget to work and then I can just build a simple batch file. Thank you John.
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
Many of us use SmugBrowser and StarExplorer without trouble. And our heroes could always undelete a mistakenly deleted album any time.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
Nobody's saying anything about being perfect, Samir. We really are just trying to help you, since you did post for help and all.. good luck to you.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
Samir, doesn't sound like you've tried SmugBrowser or Star Explorer, two options we presented to you. Sounds like you want to just build your own thing.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
Hi Samir, you sound upset, I'm sorry - this is a circular discussion. I'm not trying to tell you that everything works perfect for everyone else. I (and others) were merely trying to point out that there are tools that work well to do what you want to do. I doubt anyone deletes more galleries than I and our heroes, and we love SmugBrowser for that purpose.
Thanks!
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
My question was simple. Your answer was adequate, but not complete. John finished answering the question with the API information. I even explained why I didn't want to use third-party applications, and you guys still harped on that.
I know how buggy SM is as well as you guys do. I've been here far too long now to see that fiascos like the current issue with the 'arrange photos' tool is not the exception, but the norm. And because I don't want to be harmed by some rogue issue by not using tools that 'are fine for you', you want to make it seem like 'it's just me'?
I deal with people online every day just like you do--managing a community and dealing with people and their requests, concerns, and issues. I have customer service experience spanning over 30 years. I've know all the techniques used to sidetrack real problems, minimize real issues, and just attempt to make someone else out to the be the 'bad guy'. I've used them myself.
And I may be wrong, but I feel that I have been the target of these techniques numerous times. Maybe I bring it upon myself by not following the 'love it or leave it' rule. But I believe that if you truly care about something, you will say something and try to get something fixed if it's broken, like the image rotate tool.
I have the answer I need for the issue I came here for, and I've explained why I'm upset. Your move.
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
I'm really sorry you are upset - I only tried to help, Samir. I read and reread this thread and all I said was "Many of us use SmugBrowser and StarExplorer without trouble. And our heroes could always undelete a mistakenly deleted album any time."
Thanks for talking it out, we only wish to help. I can assure you we don't treat you any differently than anyone else - we just want to help and try our best to answer your questions.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
I have to side with Samir on this, as I think I've felt what he's feeling. When we raise an issue, bug, want or need, it should be the last resort for you guys in support to refer us to outside tools or third party applications. It is obvious that deleting multiple galleries at once should be a function of SmugMug and not a browser extension or part of a paid third party app. I have had this same response to things like bulk geotagging, rotating and cropping. "Do it locally, much better" If you're a web-app, shouldn't you be striving to outshine the desktop?
Malte
Well, I also think in terms of "Malte wants something right now - what's available and how can it be done"
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Yes... I'm not known for my patience.
Malte
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!
wget wouldn't work since it required the login cookie, so I just made a massive batch file that uses start to execute the delete url, and ping to introduce a 10s delay to fully process each deletion. I'm sure an API method (or application) probably would've had an issue with this type of load. I didn't even think a simple batch file would take this long. Good think I worked on this today rather than later in the week.
If I would've spent even a minute manually clicking away on each gallery, it would've taken 1.29 days constantly working to delete this many galleries without automation.
I realize that this type of deletion scenario rarely happens, if ever, and probably pushes the design scope of the system, but a tool to help with multiple gallery deletion is definitely needed.
Want faster uploading? Vote for FTP!