61c - A dandee snap!

2»

Comments

  • John MuellerJohn Mueller Registered Users Posts: 2,555 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2006
    Angelo,when I first opened I said to myself"we have a winner"
    Much better.
    GO FOR IT!thumb.gif
    My Smuggy

    Cincinnati Smug Leader
  • adrian_kadrian_k Registered Users Posts: 557 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2006
    yes, better. thumb.gif

    Nit picky detail - if you've used layers, back of the opacity a touch (say 85-90%) - the white is very bright. Probably because I'm comparing with the orig.
    Angelo wrote:
    Any better?
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Adrian
    my stuff is here.....
  • saurorasaurora Registered Users Posts: 4,320 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2006
    adrian_k wrote:
    yes, better. thumb.gif

    Nit picky detail - if you've used layers, back of the opacity a touch (say 85-90%) - the white is very bright. Probably because I'm comparing with the orig.

    I agree...place it somewhere between the original and the re-do. The whites are too white and you lose some of that vintage, tonal feeling, which goes along with the image. (That's my 2 cents worth!) thumb.gif
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited March 25, 2006
    Have I mentioned I HATE ps? rolleyes1.gif:D
    www.angelo.smugmug.com

    Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
  • binghottbinghott Registered Users Posts: 1,075 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2006
    adrian_k wrote:
    Angelo: I'd say that the image fits the challenge but it doesn't rock my boat. At the end of the day it's a pic of an unlit neon sign, outside of the chal. it doesn't hold up.

    i disagree! i was blown away by this shot! i bet it would look amazing in print.
    binghott.com
Sign In or Register to comment.