Which Tele Converters????
saurora
Registered Users Posts: 4,320 Major grins
Looking for some input from all of you who know your stuff about lenses and teleconverters. I have made up my mind to purchase the Canon 200mm f/2.8L lens. I want to buy a teleconverter at the same time. I am looking at the Tamron at B&H.
Tamron makes 2 kinds of teleconverters. The NORMAL converter:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=53247&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation
and the PRO SERIES:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=185156&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation
(Yeah, I don't know how to use the "here" shortcuts.....)
I am considering the PRO series as it claims to have a superior quality. I think I am correct in my understanding that it will work on this lens??? I may in the future by a longer lens. If I do, am I correct in understanding that it would have to be a 2.8 in order to use the auto-focus? I could probably never afford a long lens at that aperture, however, would I still be able to use it manually? Am I heading in the wrong direction here? I am not looking to shoot birds or wildlife consistently where I would need or require a long lens. But it would be fun on occasion. I picked the 200 for it's L quality, light weight, and inconspicuosness! I sometimes shoot the surf from a distance and need a little more length than a walk around lens. But still want something not too big (heavy). The 200 seems to fit the best. Any help is appreciated, or if you know a better teleconverter, let me know. I've considered the 70-200 f/2.8, but feel I would like a prime lens. Thanks!
Tamron makes 2 kinds of teleconverters. The NORMAL converter:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=53247&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation
and the PRO SERIES:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=185156&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation
(Yeah, I don't know how to use the "here" shortcuts.....)
I am considering the PRO series as it claims to have a superior quality. I think I am correct in my understanding that it will work on this lens??? I may in the future by a longer lens. If I do, am I correct in understanding that it would have to be a 2.8 in order to use the auto-focus? I could probably never afford a long lens at that aperture, however, would I still be able to use it manually? Am I heading in the wrong direction here? I am not looking to shoot birds or wildlife consistently where I would need or require a long lens. But it would be fun on occasion. I picked the 200 for it's L quality, light weight, and inconspicuosness! I sometimes shoot the surf from a distance and need a little more length than a walk around lens. But still want something not too big (heavy). The 200 seems to fit the best. Any help is appreciated, or if you know a better teleconverter, let me know. I've considered the 70-200 f/2.8, but feel I would like a prime lens. Thanks!
0
Comments
Its better in the long run to match the TC manufacturer to the lens manufacturer. Canon's 1.4x is considered one of the best TC's around and I recommend it. I have a Tamron 1.4x as well and use it on a 400mm for birds because it doesn't report the aperture stop loss but I do lose some fine details, its a trade off. On a 200/2.8 where you don't have to worry about AF issues, buy the Canon.
Phoenix, AZ
Canon Bodies
Canon and Zeiss Lenses
As for the Canon 200 f/2.8 I have never used one but have only heard great things about it. I believe Bird Man Photographer uses one with TC's so maybe he will chime in here. You should get pretty sharp images from this lens even with the 2x TC's since it is a fast Prime. As for which is better, the Canon or the Tamron Pro, I can't tell you because I have never used the Tamron Pro but I have heard they are pretty similar. Good luck on your purchase and be sure to show us your results.
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
is that my Canon 135 f/2.0L and 200 f/2.8L do not get along with my Sigma 1.4X EX TC. While it works fine with my Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 and 120-300 f/2.8, the CA and 'ghosting' with the Canons makes the images totally unusable.
I have no experience with the Tamrons, but personally, I would not buy a non-Canon TC no matter if I lost AF (or anything else...) or not.
The Canon 200 f/2.8L is one of the finest lenses Canon makes in my opinion, and smokes any other lens I have in that range. I highly recommend it.
Thanks, Nick. That first paragraph gave me more info than I've been able to dig up (or figure out) on my own! Now I understand why more people use the 1/4x than the 2x. Not only an additional f-stop, but retaining AF. Hmmm...wish I understood the technical reasons of these things better!
Good luck and enjoy.
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com
It's actually not as technical as you would think. Canon Digital bodies, 20D, XT and so on, besides the 1 series bodies, cannot AF with a lens that is f/8 or slower. The TC's take away light. The 1.4 TC's take away 1 stop and the 2x take away 2 stops. So with your lens (200 f/2.8) your fastest Aperture with the 1.4x TC is f/4 and with the 2x TC is f/5.6. Once you understand the basics of them they are easier to understand.
That is a good point but people also prefer the 1.4x TC because it does not degrade quality as much. The 2x TC does not give great quality on most lenses. Don't let that deter you though because on an f/2.8 Prime it should still give you acceptable quality.
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
Mike I am really excited to hear that you use this lens 90% of the time to shoot birds!! I believe you, along with Nick and Mongrel, have steered me towards the Canon 1.4x for now. Maybe I'll try a 2x if I don't get the reach I want....or maybe I'll buy another lens. Thanks again!
Then the 300mm f/2.8
Then the 400mm f/2.8
Then the 500mm f/4
Then the 600mm f/4
Then the 1200mm f/5.6
followed by filing for bankruptcy. :uhoh
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com
We never get the reach we "want", the animals, especially birds have a radar that knows how long your lens is and move that much further away. Thanks for the kind comment, I appreciate it.
Mike, think if you ordered all of those at once they would at least give you free shipping? It's only $103,200.00 plus tax. Or you could get the Sigma 300-800 for the low low price of $6,200. It has the range of 4 of the lenses you listed for $17,000 cheaper (1200mm is $80,000). It's practically a steal!
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com
Congrats...I'm sure you'll like this combo. Regarding the birds. Always carry fresh fish in your camera bag. It works wonders.
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com