Some serious photoshop work

gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
edited April 18, 2006 in The Big Picture
.

Comments

  • ivarivar Registered Users Posts: 8,395 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    :wow wow, impressive... and all from scratch...
    Ivar
    www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    That's very impressive PSing.

    But why all that work to create an image that looks exactly like a rather mundane photograph? headscratch.gif
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • USAIRUSAIR Registered Users Posts: 2,646 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    Wow I'm happy when I can create a tree to cover something in a photo
    Amazing

    Fred
    http://www.riverbendphotos.com/
    http://www.facebook.com/Riverbendphotos
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,962 moderator
    edited April 17, 2006
    wxwax wrote:
    That's very impressive PSing.

    But why all that work to create an image that looks exactly like a rather mundane photograph? headscratch.gif
    I suppose the question really is why do photorealism as a form of art. Whether you use pigment and canvas or ones and zeros is just a matter of technique. I don't know that I have an answer other than to say that it must be satisfying to the artist to create a reality from nothing. As to the viewer, I suppose whatever rocks your boat is fine. ne_nau.gif Personally, I generally don't care for it unless it is mixed with non-realist elements. Some of Gerhard Richter's stuff is really haunting.

    Cheers,
    My Pics
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    rsinmadrid wrote:
    I suppose the question really is why do photorealism as a form of art. Whether you use pigment and canvas or ones and zeros is just a matter of technique. I don't know that I have an answer other than to say that it must be satisfying to the artist to create a reality from nothing. As to the viewer, I suppose whatever rocks your boat is fine. ne_nau.gif Personally, I generally don't care for it unless it is mixed with non-realist elements. Some of Gerhard Richter's stuff is really haunting.

    Cheers,
    Thanks for that, I don't think I'd seen his work before. I always like it when folks name names and I can Google their work. thumb.gif
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • JamesJWegJamesJWeg Registered Users Posts: 795 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    What? No download link? :D Amazing work even though it falls outside of what I really care for. I can't help but think that an equal could have been made with a camera in about 1/60th of a sec.

    James.
    http://pics.jamesjweg.com
    http://www.jamesjweg.com
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    .
  • DeeDee Registered Users Posts: 2,981 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2006
    Bert Monroy
    He's famous for his stuff. My hubby attended a workshop with him, and he was a guest speaker at our local Adobe User's Group Meeting. Formerly from NY he's out here in California now.

    His work is incredible! Keeps him off the streets, right? Laughing.gif
    http://www.deegolden.smugmug.com
    http://www.twitter.com/deegolden
  • TassieDTassieD Registered Users Posts: 711 Major grins
    edited April 18, 2006
    Unbelievable, that is outstanding. Thanks for shareing Gus. I am amazed that he stuck with it for so long, but the results speak for themselves.
    Cheers
    David Clifford
Sign In or Register to comment.