My first attempt at a Pano

adm793adm793 Registered Users Posts: 5 Beginner grinner
edited April 22, 2006 in Landscapes
Please be honest, its the only way I can get better. This was taken of San Diego while I was there this week. Used PS Elements to sticth 4 images together.

-Andre

65597832-O.jpg

Comments

  • DanielBDanielB Registered Users Posts: 2,362 Major grins
    edited April 21, 2006
    sweet pano, they're so much fun.


    maybe just because its smaller, but seems like it wouldn't hurt it to give it a once-over with the sharpener. thumb.gif
    Daniel Bauer
    smugmug: www.StandOutphoto.smugmug.com

  • gluwatergluwater Registered Users Posts: 3,599 Major grins
    edited April 21, 2006
    Very nice shot Andre. Like Daniel said it is hard to get a good view of it because it is small but it looks good.
    Nick
    SmugMug Technical Account Manager
    Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
    nickwphoto
  • Ric GrupeRic Grupe Registered Users Posts: 9,522 Major grins
    edited April 21, 2006
    Very nice shot, Andre! thumb.gif

    I think it's fine the way it is. I loaded your shot in Corel PhotoPaint and masked the water....added a little (1 pixel) Guassian blur and it made the buildings stand out better IMO. For what it's worth....etc.
  • adm793adm793 Registered Users Posts: 5 Beginner grinner
    edited April 21, 2006
    Daniel and Nick,

    I would have to agree with both of you, the image does look soft, but I did the sharpening based on the Print Size of 8" x 36". At that size it is almost on the verge of too much sharpening, I am thinking that the smaller web version doesn't do it justice. If I get a little more time, I will play with a version soley for the web, but it could definetly use more sharpening.

    Thanks for the replies.

    -Andre
  • adm793adm793 Registered Users Posts: 5 Beginner grinner
    edited April 21, 2006
    Ric Grupe wrote:
    Very nice shot, Andre! thumb.gif

    I think it's fine the way it is. I loaded your shot in Corel PhotoPaint and masked the water....added a little (1 pixel) Guassian blur and it made the buildings stand out better IMO. For what it's worth....etc.

    I will have to try the Guassian blur, didn't even look at that way, do you mind posting the blurring effect, or is that even aloud on the boards, sorry I am new and havn'r read all of the rules yet.

    -Andre
  • Ric GrupeRic Grupe Registered Users Posts: 9,522 Major grins
    edited April 21, 2006
    adm793 wrote:
    I will have to try the Guassian blur, didn't even look at that way, do you mind posting the blurring effect, or is that even aloud on the boards, sorry I am new and havn'r read all of the rules yet.

    -Andre

    What photo editor do you use?

    Gaussian blur is an effect that most editors have in a drop down box named "effects" or possibly "filters".

    Just select the water area with a freehand or maybe a rectangle mask. That way you are only applying the blur to that part of the image.

    65607959-L.jpg
  • ChrisJChrisJ Registered Users Posts: 2,164 Major grins
    edited April 21, 2006
    This is a really nice panorama. My only comment is on the sky in the middle third: it looks like it doesn't quite match the two ends.

    Great job if this is your first attempt! thumb.gif
    Chris
  • adm793adm793 Registered Users Posts: 5 Beginner grinner
    edited April 22, 2006
    Ric Grupe wrote:
    What photo editor do you use?

    Gaussian blur is an effect that most editors have in a drop down box named "effects" or possibly "filters".

    Just select the water area with a freehand or maybe a rectangle mask. That way you are only applying the blur to that part of the image.
    Sorry must have taken me wrong, I know what Gaussian blur is, just didn't think about appling it on the water. I definetley like what you have done, when I get a little more ambitious I will have to play around with layers and masking a little more. BTW, I am using Photoshop Elements 3 until I get comfortable enough with its limitations to justify the full nlown version.

    Thanks for the tip, I definetley like it more than the orginal.

    -Andre
Sign In or Register to comment.