Candle lit dinner, honest opinions please
luke_church
Registered Users Posts: 507 Major grins
Hi All,
So the photo below was taken at a 'mid-way dinner' which is a tradition in this part of the world.
Now, I like this photo for a number of reasons, but I'd be interested in what people with no associations to the person or the event think. People here may well err on the side of politeness to me... :
Hence, please be brutally honest, as a photo, do you like it? :ear
As always, any more detail, comments as to why you like it/don't like it and suggestions for improvement are always a bonus.
If you're interested in technical details:
Canon 350D, 50mm f1.8 Mk II, ISO 1600, ACR, blend mask of USM + Gaussian blur
Many thanks,
Luke
So the photo below was taken at a 'mid-way dinner' which is a tradition in this part of the world.
Now, I like this photo for a number of reasons, but I'd be interested in what people with no associations to the person or the event think. People here may well err on the side of politeness to me... :
Hence, please be brutally honest, as a photo, do you like it? :ear
As always, any more detail, comments as to why you like it/don't like it and suggestions for improvement are always a bonus.
If you're interested in technical details:
Canon 350D, 50mm f1.8 Mk II, ISO 1600, ACR, blend mask of USM + Gaussian blur
Many thanks,
Luke
0
Comments
For a situational shot, this is quite good - sure there's a distracting hand in the bg, but so what. The girl, the main event, she's so strong. And supported by the lovely candle light.
I'd try your method of choice, to bring down the saturation a but - shots at high ISO tend to oversaturate. Of course, this is personal taste so take it FWIW.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
It sure is. ISO 1600 + fairly fast glass + RAW means photos in places that simply wouldn't work without it.
Glad you liked it :
You were right. A simple saturation layer set to -15 seems to have done the trick.
Thanks for that.
Luke
SmugSoftware: www.smugtools.com
Glad you liked it. Thanks for looking and for the comment. :
Luke
SmugSoftware: www.smugtools.com
I actually prefer your original, I like the golden glow and I believe the noise/grain looks better than in your second.
Very nice!
Cheers!
David
www.uniqueday.com
Very nice!
I too like the warm glow of the first post, but I think I like the end result in the second better.
www.photosbylissa.com
www.photosbylissa.blogspot.com
Gear
Nikon D200
Nikon D70
Nikon N70
Nikkor 24-70 f2.8
Nikkor 50mm f1.8
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikkor 18-70
Tamron 75-300
SB-600
A 25% cooling filter seems to give a nice result on the original also.
chrisjennings.smugmug.com
Use coupon 6bPSMkMYrhpVE to save $5.00 on a new smugmug account
Thanks for your comments David.
SmugSoftware: www.smugtools.com
Thanks, I'll look into that.
SmugSoftware: www.smugtools.com
It's always a little difficult, the CYMK preview version on my monitor calibrated to my print-shop looks somewhat different again. I guess I should start producing versions tuned for the web.
Thanks for your comment.
Luke
SmugSoftware: www.smugtools.com
I won't sell out even if the whole world think's I'm crazy.
As a photo layman, I find the background artifacts bother me. The gausian blur seems to have created some weird shapes and or noise/grain that keeps pulling my eye away from the subject. Especially the hand that was mentioned prior.
That's my only nit with the photo. Great job in difficult light.
Gene
When I read that you wanted the brutal truth, I started to really look at the image. My first thought was that I would open up the shadow on her face a bit, but second thoughts convinced me that doing so would detract from the strength.
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile