File Browser in PS

wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
edited October 27, 2004 in Finishing School
For the first time, I used File Browser in Photoshop CS to look at my RAW files.

It's not bad. But I noticed a huge slowdown in everything I tried to do on Photoshop. Vaguely remembering something I'd heard, I purged the File Browser cache. And voila, instant change: my speed in Photoshop was back to normal.

This experience makes me leery of using PS file browser. I have Canon's Digital Photo Professional, and I may use that more or less exclusively from now on.
Sid.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au

Comments

  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    purge $
    been using ps cs browser for a long time :bash and thank you sid, for this little tip :D i take back everything i ever said about you lol3.gif


    wxwax wrote:
    For the first time, I used File Browser in Photoshop CS to look at my RAW files.

    It's not bad. But I noticed a huge slowdown in everything I tried to do on Photoshop. Vaguely remembering something I'd heard, I purged the File Browser cache. And voila, instant change: my speed in Photoshop was back to normal.

    This experience makes me leery of using PS file browser. I have Canon's Digital Photo Professional, and I may use that more or less exclusively from now on.
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    andy wrote:
    been using ps cs browser for a long time :bash and thank you sid, for this little tip :D i take back everything i ever said about you lol3.gif
    rolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gif You're welcome!

    I think. umph.gif
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    wxwax wrote:
    rolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gif You're welcome!

    I think. umph.gif
    Is there a down side to purging your cache? I have also been using the file browser for a while and I am pretty happy with it. I with the preview image was bigger so I could delete the crappy images without opening first tho.
    Thomas :D

    TML Photography
    tmlphoto.com
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Is there a down side to purging your cache? I have also been using the file browser for a while and I am pretty happy with it. I with the preview image was bigger so I could delete the crappy images without opening first tho.

    you can create custom thumbnail sizes. give it a twirl deal.gif
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Is there a down side to purging your cache? I have also been using the file browser for a while and I am pretty happy with it. I with the preview image was bigger so I could delete the crappy images without opening first tho.

    Here's Adobe's page on it. Sounds like you lose any mark you may have put on a photo to distinguish it from the others. Also, deleting the cache will slow down recalling the photo.

    Neither one's a big deal, and neither would matter much to me after an editing session. ne_nau.gif

    The slowdown in PS performance was remarkable and painful, so deleting the cache was well worth it to me.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • patch29patch29 Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,928 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    Does it speed it up if you export cache? That way you save any editing info you may have created. I don't use it very often. I use the browser in C1 Pro most often.
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited October 24, 2004
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Is there a down side to purging your cache? I have also been using the file browser for a while and I am pretty happy with it. I with the preview image was bigger so I could delete the crappy images without opening first tho.


    NO NEED TO OPEN BEFORE DELETING MAGES!! Thomas - you can have the preview images in the PSCS File browser any size you want - Click on View in the File Browser in the uppper left menu of the File browser and click on custom Thumbnail size. You can have a lightbox with as many or as few images as you desire - I use 300 pixels for sorting - and you can save this configuaration to use it later by going to the command line in PS itself and clicking on Window - Workspace - save Workspace.. You can have as many different configurations of the browser saved as you need. One for sorting images with larger preview images 300-500 pixels and NO META DATA or file structure, OR you can have a smaller light table and a very large image inspection panel on the left and save this also. The File Browserr can be configured many different ways and each way called up as needed.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited October 24, 2004
    wxwax wrote:
    For the first time, I used File Browser in Photoshop CS to look at my RAW files.

    It's not bad. But I noticed a huge slowdown in everything I tried to do on Photoshop. Vaguely remembering something I'd heard, I purged the File Browser cache. And voila, instant change: my speed in Photoshop was back to normal.

    This experience makes me leery of using PS file browser. I have Canon's Digital Photo Professional, and I may use that more or less exclusively from now on.


    Waxy, I have not experienced this - you're saying everything you do in Photoshop is slower if you have a lot of images in the File Browser cache?

    I open hundreds in the file browser and do not notice that the processing is slow - even doing filters in 16 bit. I tried to use Digital Photo Professional today and it is very fast at batch processing ( almost instantaneous), but did not seem to me to give nearly as intimate control over the process of RAW conversion as the PS RAW convertor. I thought I would need Digital Photo Professional to process 20D RAW files, but the Adobe PS RAW convertor handled them just like 1D raw files without even coughing. ne_nau.gif
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    NO NEED TO OPEN BEFORE DELETING MAGES!! Thomas - you can have the preview images in the PSCS File browser any size you want - Click on View in the File Browser in the uppper left menu of the File browser and click on custom Thumbnail size. You can have a lightbox with as many or as few images as you desire - I use 300 pixels for sorting - and you can save this configuaration to use it later by going to the command line in PS itself and clicking on Window - Workspace - save Workspace.. You can have as many different configurations of the browser saved as you need. One for sorting images with larger preview images 300-500 pixels and NO META DATA or file structure, OR you can have a smaller light table and a very large image inspection panel on the left and save this also. The File Browserr can be configured many different ways and each way called up as needed.
    Thanks Path & Andy. I upped my thumbs to 350. Enough to decide to trash or convert. Path you alluded to a way to make the preview window bigger. How do you do this. I think I might like the small thumbs with a larger preview better. TIA
    Thomas :D

    TML Photography
    tmlphoto.com
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    preview window
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Thanks Path & Andy. I upped my thumbs to 350. Enough to decide to trash or convert. Path you alluded to a way to make the preview window bigger. How do you do this. I think I might like the small thumbs with a larger preview better. TIA

    just click and drag it to the right to make bigger...
  • tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
    edited October 24, 2004
    andy wrote:
    just click and drag it to the right to make bigger...
    Thanks, I was trying to make it too complicated. (menus, submenus, sub-submenus...)
    Thomas :D

    TML Photography
    tmlphoto.com
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited October 24, 2004
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Thanks Path & Andy. I upped my thumbs to 350. Enough to decide to trash or convert. Path you alluded to a way to make the preview window bigger. How do you do this. I think I might like the small thumbs with a larger preview better. TIA

    Open your File Browser and you can move the vertical dimension between the file icons and the preview image by putting your mouse over it and clicking and dragging it right or left. Drag it to the right so you can see two columns of image icons - then double click on the Folders and Metadata tabs and they will shrink to the upper and lower borders of the File Browser window. Now you have a really big preview image. NOW>>>> click on Window in the PS command line - then click on Workspace - then on Save Workspace and give it a name. Then can get that version of the Browser configuration back again without having to click and drag and everything. So now you can have a File Browser configured to be a light table or a preveiw image viewer. Why didn't Adobe do this for us huh??!!
    The chapters on the File Browser are so dull to read, but it really is a very useful gadget once you get the hang of it. Like I said earlier, I used Digital Photo Pro 1.1 from Canon earlier today, but, for me, I am an Adobe guy all the way!
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited October 24, 2004
    andy wrote:
    just click and drag it to the right to make bigger...


    Hah!!! What Andy said rolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gif
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited October 27, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    Waxy, I have not experienced this - you're saying everything you do in Photoshop is slower if you have a lot of images in the File Browser cache?

    I open hundreds in the file browser and do not notice that the processing is slow - even doing filters in 16 bit. I tried to use Digital Photo Professional today and it is very fast at batch processing ( almost instantaneous), but did not seem to me to give nearly as intimate control over the process of RAW conversion as the PS RAW convertor. I thought I would need Digital Photo Professional to process 20D RAW files, but the Adobe PS RAW convertor handled them just like 1D raw files without even coughing. ne_nau.gif

    Sorry, I missed this. I've only used File Browser once or twice. My thumbs are very large - I don't know if that has anything to do with it.

    All I can say is that my machine slowed down significantly when I double clicked on a thumb and started playing with it. And when I had a non-RAW image open, and was doing regular editing, everything was painfully slow. This was with File Browser *closed.* When I cleaned out the cache, life was back to normal. ne_nau.gif

    I have a Pentium processor, I think it's 1.6. And 1gb of memory. I do notice that my Photoshop is a *lot* slower with 16-bit, 8 megapixel images from the mkII than it is with 16-bit 4mp images from the 1D.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Sign In or Register to comment.