My lens got scratched on my last trip...is there a possibility that i can remove the scratch ?
Light scratches wont really impact images they can cause flare, ghosting, and contrast loss. Canon or Nikon replace front elements often enough that its pretty cheap from what I understand. I would get a quote from them before attempting anything.
Bob
Phoenix, AZ
Canon Bodies
Canon and Zeiss Lenses
Light scratches wont really impact images they can cause flare, ghosting, and contrast loss. Canon or Nikon replace front elements often enough that its pretty cheap from what I understand. I would get a quote from them before attempting anything.
Also, i'd prove that it affects your photo before you invest in the repair.
My Tamron 28-75 has front element pitting. Not sure how it happened, but there's little white specs that look like dust, but don't come out. (not many, only 7-10 of them, scattered.
Have I ever seen one on a photo? Nope. Definitely seen dust on the sensor though.
Front element = not important.
Rear element until sensor = critical.
Not worth the repair IMHO.
Photos of the scratch? (maybe its' a giant gouge)
- Scott http://framebyframe.ca [Bodies] Canon EOS 20D - Canon EOS 500 [Lenses] Sigma APO 70-200 f/2.8 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 - Tamron XR Di 28-75mm f/2.8 - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
[Flash] Sigma EF500 Super DG Flash
[Tripod] Manfrotto 055 Pro Black
[Head] 484RC2, 200RC2
While all of these replies is good, if the lens is not worth repair but worth keeping, and if the scratch is deep enough to cause problems, you can minimize the problems by "filling" the scratch.
Some large antique lenses had bubbles and other surface anomalies which the manufacturers simply filled with black paint. This serves to mask the problem and prevent most of it's affect.
Anyone familiar with gravure printing can coach you on the process, or you can read about it on the "Net".
While all of these replies is good, if the lens is not worth repair but worth keeping, and if the scratch is deep enough to cause problems, you can minimize the problems by "filling" the scratch.
Some large antique lenses had bubbles and other surface anomalies which the manufacturers simply filled with black paint. This serves to mask the problem and prevent most of it's affect.
Anyone familiar with gravure printing can coach you on the process, or you can read about it on the "Net".
Notice that I used the word "antique"? I guess I pretty well date myself with this response. (... and I make a pretty terrible date, if I do say so myself, which apparently I just did, so I'll shut up now. )
Thank you so much guys! I really appreciate everyones opinion about my problem. That tiny scratch did not affect the quality of my pics, i've tried it several times yesterday...the results are great, no glares or anything on the pictures..thank you so much!:): i'll forget investing on repair .
Thank you so much guys! I really appreciate everyones opinion about my problem. That tiny scratch did not affect the quality of my pics, i've tried it several times yesterday...the results are great, no glares or anything on the pictures..thank you so much!:): i'll forget investing on repair .
That's great news!
Next time, scratch your back instead, or better still, scratch the back of someone great looking of the opposite gender. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Comments
Phoenix, AZ
Canon Bodies
Canon and Zeiss Lenses
Also, i'd prove that it affects your photo before you invest in the repair.
My Tamron 28-75 has front element pitting. Not sure how it happened, but there's little white specs that look like dust, but don't come out. (not many, only 7-10 of them, scattered.
Have I ever seen one on a photo? Nope. Definitely seen dust on the sensor though.
Front element = not important.
Rear element until sensor = critical.
Not worth the repair IMHO.
Photos of the scratch? (maybe its' a giant gouge)
http://framebyframe.ca
[Bodies] Canon EOS 20D - Canon EOS 500
[Lenses] Sigma APO 70-200 f/2.8 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 - Tamron XR Di 28-75mm f/2.8 - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
[Flash] Sigma EF500 Super DG Flash
[Tripod] Manfrotto 055 Pro Black
[Head] 484RC2, 200RC2
Some large antique lenses had bubbles and other surface anomalies which the manufacturers simply filled with black paint. This serves to mask the problem and prevent most of it's affect.
Anyone familiar with gravure printing can coach you on the process, or you can read about it on the "Net".
http://glossary.ippaper.com/default.asp?req=knowledge/article/152
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
100 Points for that answer.
I'd totally forgotten that they used to do that.
http://framebyframe.ca
[Bodies] Canon EOS 20D - Canon EOS 500
[Lenses] Sigma APO 70-200 f/2.8 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 - Tamron XR Di 28-75mm f/2.8 - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
[Flash] Sigma EF500 Super DG Flash
[Tripod] Manfrotto 055 Pro Black
[Head] 484RC2, 200RC2
Thanks Scott.
Notice that I used the word "antique"? I guess I pretty well date myself with this response. (... and I make a pretty terrible date, if I do say so myself, which apparently I just did, so I'll shut up now. )
See how old people just go on and on ...?
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
That's great news!
Next time, scratch your back instead, or better still, scratch the back of someone great looking of the opposite gender. Yeah, that's the ticket.
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums