AWB on 20D versus Mark II
I know the 20D came out after the 1D Mark II. And I know the 20D had a very nice improvement of auto-white-balance over the 10D. But after shooting a night motocross last night with the Mark II (very difficult lighting conditions) I found the results rather poor in terms of the white balance, and to some extent exposure as well. I'm very lucky that it was a small race and that I shot RAW, which I rarely do.
Is the Mark II not as good at AWB as a 20D is?
Is the Mark II not as good at AWB as a 20D is?
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
0
Comments
I shoot with a 1DMkII and a 20D and have not really felt the AWB was inferior to the 20D. My first impression, ( and it is only an impression at best) would favor the 1DMkII - but that is just from shooting birds, mostly in sunlight.
Some sources of artificial light are really funky though
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
Probably Metal Halide lamps for track they give off a very white light but has a blue cast to them.
Next is Mecury Vapor also white light but give a yellow cast.
High Pressure Sodium are yellow mostly for security...parking areas
Fred
http://www.facebook.com/Riverbendphotos
Raw Shooter Essentials, or the full Raw Shooter, has the ability to show the white balance that the camera "guessed" for each RAW frame. I would suggest looking at that information and then at the images themselves to determine if there was (insert shudder here), "mixed lighting". If you notice a pattern of different white balance for different locations or when you pan the camera in a different direction, that's usually the problem.
Once you determine a pattern, you can group similar images into groups, and then process optimally for each group.
If you can't detect a pattern, I would guess a problem relating to that specific camera. I have read that white balance and color management is very similar between the 20D/30D and the 1D MKII/n. They all use the same Digic II for image and video processing and camera control , as does the dRebel XT for that matter.
Best,
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Put the "filter" on the camera, shoot one frame aiming at the light source. This produces a frame that shows the difference between the light you are getting and an 18% gray. You can use that reference frame in post to color correct all your images shot under that light.
Alternatively, you can do the same reference frame thing, but use that frame for setting your custom white balance.
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
I will say that some lighting -- it's not about "white balance" -- but the lighting itself is deficient and can't be corrected by merely setting a proper wb.
Lee
Unsharp at any Speed
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu