I know the Canon TC won't work, but I'm curious to see what happens when say a 1.4x is applied to this lens.
I was curious too. So when my sports fan daughter came home for a few weeks, we went to see a playoff hockey game. Knowing I couldn't get my 70-200 in (the ol' 6 inch rule :-( I decided to bring the 85 F1.8 attached to the Tamron 1.4X TC. With upperdeck seats (behind the netting I might add) and the 85's propensity for purple fringing (lots of high contrast edges with that white background :-( I figured this has got to be a worst-case test.
It was.......lol When play was at our end the results were decent. But the DOF was way shallower than what I see shooting basketball and the corners, using this lens, are always a bit soft anyway.
Bottomline. The results weren't awful, but they weren't what I know I can get from my 70-200 with this TC attached. BTW, AF worked just fine. Barely a slowdown
Give me a few hours and I'll post some originals and some crops. You can then judge for yourself.
Awwww man :cry I was so "not thrilled" by the above mentioned shots, that I reformatted the CF without uploading the originals I just post processed a few right from my reader. All I have is 800x600's. Which I guess is better than nothing, eh?
Wow, thanks Pez! That is not as bad as I expected at all.
What TC are you using?
Whoops, forgot to mention it. My bad. I'm using the Tamron flavored 1.4 extender for that shot. I have the Canon 1.4 extender as well as the 2x but they are not accessible at the moment. But, I can tell you it (Tamron extender) does perform pretty fairly considering. The focus hunting is a bit of a lag with the Tamron setup, but all in all, it was very satisfactory.
Professional Ancient Smugmug Shutter Geek
Master Of Sushi Noms
Amateur CSS Dork
Comments
I was curious too. So when my sports fan daughter came home for a few weeks, we went to see a playoff hockey game. Knowing I couldn't get my 70-200 in (the ol' 6 inch rule :-( I decided to bring the 85 F1.8 attached to the Tamron 1.4X TC. With upperdeck seats (behind the netting I might add) and the 85's propensity for purple fringing (lots of high contrast edges with that white background :-( I figured this has got to be a worst-case test.
It was.......lol When play was at our end the results were decent. But the DOF was way shallower than what I see shooting basketball
Bottomline. The results weren't awful, but they weren't what I know I can get from my 70-200 with this TC attached. BTW, AF worked just fine. Barely a slowdown
Give me a few hours and I'll post some originals and some crops. You can then judge for yourself.
Steve
to the "6" rule?
Canon EF 200 f/2.8L with the 1.4x TC?
The 200 is just a hair over 6" with the caps in place, so take them off
Of course, you would be at f/4.0 so....
Better alternative (ie-more expensive...), would be the 135mm f/2.0L and TC. Gives you f/2.8 and better range than the 85.
Well yes, but I just happen to have an 85 1.8 and very little $$
Master Of Sushi Noms
Amateur CSS Dork
All shot between F2 and F2.5 @ ISO400.
I hope this helps a little
Steve
85 1.8 and 1.4x
ISO 100 1/1600 shutter
Here it is cropped
You can check the second image at a higher resolution on my site
http://www.pezpix.com/gallery/1517226/1/72856422
Master Of Sushi Noms
Amateur CSS Dork
What TC are you using?
Master Of Sushi Noms
Amateur CSS Dork