TC on Canon 85mm 1.8

limbiklimbik Registered Users Posts: 379 Major grins
edited June 2, 2006 in Accessories
I know the Canon TC won't work, but I'm curious to see what happens when say a 1.4x is applied to this lens.

Comments

  • Steve CaviglianoSteve Cavigliano Super Moderators Posts: 3,599 moderator
    edited June 1, 2006
    limbik wrote:
    I know the Canon TC won't work, but I'm curious to see what happens when say a 1.4x is applied to this lens.

    I was curious too. So when my sports fan daughter came home for a few weeks, we went to see a playoff hockey game. Knowing I couldn't get my 70-200 in (the ol' 6 inch rule :-( I decided to bring the 85 F1.8 attached to the Tamron 1.4X TC. With upperdeck seats (behind the netting I might add) and the 85's propensity for purple fringing (lots of high contrast edges with that white background :-( I figured this has got to be a worst-case test.

    It was.......lol When play was at our end the results were decent. But the DOF was way shallower than what I see shooting basketball headscratch.gif and the corners, using this lens, are always a bit soft anyway.

    Bottomline. The results weren't awful, but they weren't what I know I can get from my 70-200 with this TC attached. BTW, AF worked just fine. Barely a slowdown :D

    Give me a few hours and I'll post some originals and some crops. You can then judge for yourself.

    Steve
    SmugMug Support Hero
  • MongrelMongrel Registered Users Posts: 622 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    Possible answer...
    to the "6" rule?

    Canon EF 200 f/2.8L with the 1.4x TC?

    The 200 is just a hair over 6" with the caps in place, so take them off :D

    Of course, you would be at f/4.0 so....

    Better alternative (ie-more expensive...), would be the 135mm f/2.0L and TC. Gives you f/2.8 and better range than the 85.
    If every keystroke was a shutter press I'd be a pro by now...
  • limbiklimbik Registered Users Posts: 379 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    Mongrel wrote:
    Better alternative (ie-more expensive...), would be the 135mm f/2.0L and TC. Gives you f/2.8 and better range than the 85.

    Well yes, but I just happen to have an 85 1.8 and very little $$ :D
  • PezpixPezpix Registered Users Posts: 391 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    Ok, ok, since you begged, I'll go test it! Brb with some conclusions for you thumb.gif
    Professional Ancient Smugmug Shutter Geek
    Master Of Sushi Noms
    Amateur CSS Dork
  • Steve CaviglianoSteve Cavigliano Super Moderators Posts: 3,599 moderator
    edited June 1, 2006
    Awwww man :cry I was so "not thrilled" by the above mentioned shots, that I reformatted the CF without uploading the originals 11doh.gif I just post processed a few right from my reader. All I have is 800x600's. Which I guess is better than nothing, eh?

    72854121-L.jpg

    72854071-L.jpg

    72854018-L.jpg


    72853972-L.jpg

    72853936-L.jpg

    All shot between F2 and F2.5 @ ISO400.

    I hope this helps a little ne_nau.gif

    Steve
    SmugMug Support Hero
  • limbiklimbik Registered Users Posts: 379 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    Well, it confirms nothing really bad will happen... :D
  • PezpixPezpix Registered Users Posts: 391 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    Ok, here's the infamous purple fringing at its worst. Settings were as follows

    85 1.8 and 1.4x
    ISO 100 1/1600 shutter

    72856388-L.jpg

    Here it is cropped

    72856422-L.jpg

    You can check the second image at a higher resolution on my site
    http://www.pezpix.com/gallery/1517226/1/72856422
    Professional Ancient Smugmug Shutter Geek
    Master Of Sushi Noms
    Amateur CSS Dork
  • limbiklimbik Registered Users Posts: 379 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    Wow, thanks Pez! That is not as bad as I expected at all.
    What TC are you using?
  • PezpixPezpix Registered Users Posts: 391 Major grins
    edited June 1, 2006
    limbik wrote:
    Wow, thanks Pez! That is not as bad as I expected at all.
    What TC are you using?
    Whoops, forgot to mention it. My bad. I'm using the Tamron flavored 1.4 extender for that shot. I have the Canon 1.4 extender as well as the 2x but they are not accessible at the moment. But, I can tell you it (Tamron extender) does perform pretty fairly considering. The focus hunting is a bit of a lag with the Tamron setup, but all in all, it was very satisfactory. thumb.gif
    Professional Ancient Smugmug Shutter Geek
    Master Of Sushi Noms
    Amateur CSS Dork
  • limbiklimbik Registered Users Posts: 379 Major grins
    edited June 2, 2006
    Anybody know if this will work with the Kenko 1.5x Teleplus TC?
Sign In or Register to comment.