nature at home

LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
edited June 25, 2006 in Wildlife
A lot of my nature shots come from my front yard. Here are a couple from this week.

Feedback is welcomed!

I liked how the leaves curved around the butterfly. I wonder if you agree or think that it makes the shot "busy"???
76301995-L.jpg


Had just given up waiting when this little girl showed up.
Think I should tell my boss why I was late to work?
77310907-L.jpg

Hope you enjoy:):

Comments

  • raptorcaptorraptorcaptor Registered Users Posts: 3,968 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Really like the color saturation in the second photo! clap.gif
    Glenn

    My website | NANPA Member
  • saurorasaurora Registered Users Posts: 4,320 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Both are very nicely exposed and very rich colors! thumb.gif
  • Dick on ArubaDick on Aruba Registered Users Posts: 3,484 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Very beautiful captures LCD.

    A lot of beauty is often going on in your backyard.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Dick.
    "Nothing sharpens sight like envy."
    Thomas Fuller.

    SmugMug account.
    Website.
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    The himmer shot is marvelous. thumb.gif The leaves are fine in the first shot but your focus is sharper on the leaves than the butterfly.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    I agree with Harry about the leaves being fine in the first image. Adds context.

    However, I don't completely agree about the focus. It appears to me you had very shallow DOF and got the head of the butterfly well in focus. It just happens that many of the leaves were the same distance from the camera and thus were also in focus while the butterfly's wings and his right antenna were mostly OOF.

    Or, I could be completely wrong and owe Harry an apology.

    Either way, I think both photos are well done!
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    I agree with Harry about the leaves being fine in the first image. Adds context.

    However, I don't completely agree about the focus. It appears to me you had very shallow DOF and got the head of the butterfly well in focus. It just happens that many of the leaves were the same distance from the camera and thus were also in focus while the butterfly's wings and his right antenna were mostly OOF.

    Or, I could be completely wrong and owe Harry an apology.

    Either way, I think both photos are well done!

    I should have said he needed a deeper DOF on the shot. Its fine to have the head in focus buthere its mostly black and w/o details. Its offsetting to have the leaves nice and sharp and then to have the main subject not in focus. Now if the head was more interesting then the shallow DOF would had worked. On the shot you start looking at the butterfly but your attention keeps getting drawn to those sharp leaves and they don't get enough competition from the subject which is the butterfly.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • dallasdallas Registered Users Posts: 1,638 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Excellent LCD, what's hiding in your backyard? thumb.gifthumb.gif
  • jwearjwear Registered Users Posts: 8,013 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    i am with harry --second time but first shot got to be a red x
    Jeff W

    “PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”

    http://jwear.smugmug.com/
  • LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Thanks for the feedback Harry and Scott. I have to agree that the leaves do pull your eyes - now that you point it out.
    I've been working on getting more dof on my bugs - and my birds, but it did not help in this shot that the wings were moving. And, I'm notoriously bad about using a tripod - I just don't - so I try not to stop down too much.
    Hmmm, tripod?? I guess it will work on the florals.headscratch.gif

    Thanks again for the feedback. I was working on a list for printing, and I think now that I will skip this b-fly.

    Much appreciated,
    Lisa
  • LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    jwear wrote:
    i am with harry --second time but first shot got to be a red x

    OK, I'm a newbie here. You'll have to explain this one. ne_nau.gif

    and thanks for commenting!
  • LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    dallas wrote:
    Excellent LCD, what's hiding in your backyard? thumb.gifthumb.gif

    Thanks for the comment, dallas.
    Not too much hides in the back yard as the dogs have complete access. So, the wildlife sticks mostly to the fy.
  • LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Really like the color saturation in the second photo! clap.gif

    Thanks for the comment Glenn.
  • LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    saurora wrote:
    Both are very nicely exposed and very rich colors! thumb.gif

    Thanks, Saurora. appreciate the comment.
  • LCDLCD Registered Users Posts: 494 Major grins
    edited June 25, 2006
    Very beautiful captures LCD.

    A lot of beauty is often going on in your backyard.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Dick.

    Thanks for the comment Dick.

    Was checking out Smuggy. She looks like a real sweatheart! And you must be one too for taking her in. I'm glad she's on the mend.
Sign In or Register to comment.