Charlotte

Ted SzukalskiTed Szukalski Registered Users Posts: 1,079 Major grins
edited June 27, 2006 in People
I wonder what you think about the lastest portrait additions to my gallery.

I have finally overcome my shyness and have taken a lot of portraits. While they are waiting to be processed here are the first three photographs.

Comments

  • OwenOwen Registered Users Posts: 948 Major grins
    edited June 26, 2006
    Whatever skin adjustment technique you're using, it looks a bit fake, and sort of OOF, but the models are gorgeous and I like your use of DOF.

    Owen
  • Ted SzukalskiTed Szukalski Registered Users Posts: 1,079 Major grins
    edited June 26, 2006
    Would you believe I had not used any softening of the skin in these shots at all. I do not know what kind of makeup the first 2 models had, but since the photos come from an organised show, including makeup sponsorship I can assume they had some professional makeup artist. Last girl is very young and simply had naturally clean skin. Never the less I will review the raw images tonight and see I can make them look more natural. I'm using Bibble so any one who has experience with this and skin tones and textures I'd like to hear from you.
    Owen wrote:
    Whatever skin adjustment technique you're using, it looks a bit fake, and sort of OOF, but the models are gorgeous and I like your use of DOF.

    Owen
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited June 26, 2006
    Ted,
    With all due respect: ISO 800 and 1/1600 sec - what were you trying to achieve? ne_nau.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • Ted SzukalskiTed Szukalski Registered Users Posts: 1,079 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    I knew someone will ask about this.

    These photos were taken in a dark shopping centre. The models were on catwalk which had no light to speak off. They moved fast - very fast and I'm there with a Sigma 70-200 2.8 hand held in a crowd. I could have used lower ISO like 400 but than I am not sure I would get all shots. In fact I had to push +1 to +2ev in postprocessing for many of them. I took 340 photos in just over an hour - all at F2.8 with AV priority. Time varied from 1/50 to 1/6000. I really had no time to change settings from shot to shot. This was "safe" setting. Last photo was taken with a 28-75 Tamron and I admit settings on that one were "less than desired" - to tell you honestly - it was a setting from a previous outdoor shot. Sometimes capturing the moment is more important than ideal settings.
    Nikolai wrote:
    With all due respect: ISO 800 and 1/1600 sec - what were you trying to achieve? ne_nau.gif
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    Ah, ok, gotcha, thanks!
    I knew someone will ask about this.
    ....
    Sometimes capturing the moment is more important than ideal settings.

    Can't argue with that:-)
    Thanks for sharing!thumb.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • OwenOwen Registered Users Posts: 948 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    Did you use any noise reduction software?
  • Ted SzukalskiTed Szukalski Registered Users Posts: 1,079 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    Yes, these are ISO 800 shots in dark environment so there was some noise. I've used noiseninja profiling each picture individually.
    Owen wrote:
    Did you use any noise reduction software?
  • OwenOwen Registered Users Posts: 948 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    That explains the skin. I would prefer noise to the smoothed out look.

    Owen
Sign In or Register to comment.