Kata bags: Opinion?

TylerWTylerW Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
edited June 30, 2006 in Accessories
been eyeing the R-103 rucksack for about a week now to suit my photo backpack needs. No one I know carries them, and I hate buying stuff sight unseen, but the quality just looks to be absolutely top shelf with these guys. Anyone have any experience with them? Are they as stout as they look? Is getting to your gear a fussy affair? Are they comfortable enough for all-day wearability?

Thanks in advance.
http://www.tylerwinegarner.com

Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L

Comments

  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    I looked at the ones B&H had on their shelves.

    I didn't like them. Build quality did not feel good. Additional storage was meager and an afterthought. The bags felt cramped.

    About the only thing I like was the second "hatch" giving access to your gear.

    I was most unimpressed.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • TylerWTylerW Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    That's a mixed bummer. Any other recommendations for all-day comfort packs that will easily hold a telephoto or two, as well as a laptop?
    http://www.tylerwinegarner.com

    Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
  • DanteDante Registered Users Posts: 109 Major grins
    edited June 27, 2006
    Sorry to hear that...I was also looking at buying a Kata R-103.

    I've been looking for a backpack that will hold a 30D with a 70-200 2.8L IS attached and a couple additional lenses - anyone have recommendations?

    Thanks,

    -Dante
    -Troy (Dante)
    ________________________
    http://troybn.smugmug.com/
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    TylerW wrote:
    That's a mixed bummer. Any other recommendations for all-day comfort packs that will easily hold a telephoto or two, as well as a laptop?
    As long as you don't want to carry too many accessories, the Karachi Outpost is comfortable. But don't expect a lot of storage for anything other than lenses and laptop. I also have the small Tenba backpack, it will hold a lot, but I'm not sure it's all day comfortable (Patch tells me I'm just using the belt wrong.)
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    Dante wrote:
    Sorry to hear that...I was also looking at buying a Kata R-103.

    I've been looking for a backpack that will hold a 30D with a 70-200 2.8L IS attached and a couple additional lenses - anyone have recommendations?

    Thanks,

    -Dante
    Lots of 'em out there. The Lowepro mini trekker can easily hold that.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • claudermilkclaudermilk Registered Users Posts: 2,756 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    Interesting. I looked a little at the R-104 on the floor at Samy's & thought it was well-made & had plenty of room. I've been looking at getting the R-103 after the lens collection grows more; I might go Lowepro as well since my current two bags are Lowepro (OffTrail2 and Slingshot 200--the reason for my Samy's visit), both are excellent.

    Check out www.cambags.com to see what the various choices can hold in the real world.
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    I have the Karachi Outpost, and it's comfortable, more comfortable than my LowePro CompuTrekker. I gotta say, though, that the LowePro is much more space efficient.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • TylerWTylerW Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    DavidTO wrote:
    I have the Karachi Outpost, and it's comfortable, more comfortable than my LowePro CompuTrekker. I gotta say, though, that the LowePro is much more space efficient.

    I don't know if I need the full karachi outpost, but that Whickey ad Cox is looking better and better the more I see it. Its a fair amount to spend on a backpack, but I don't want to buy something and feel like I need to make apologies for it later.

    Is it unreasonable to think I could fit a 10d w/a 70-200mm + 1.4exII tc, another (perhaps longer) zoom, such as a 100-400 L, plus a walkaround 28-80 in there?

    Also, does it have any external loops, etc that I could clip a water bottle to via a carabiner?
    http://www.tylerwinegarner.com

    Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    DavidTO wrote:
    I have the Karachi Outpost, and it's comfortable, more comfortable than my LowePro CompuTrekker. I gotta say, though, that the LowePro is much more space efficient.
    I looked at the Computrekker too. And you can see where the backpack world falls into two categories: those built for comfort, and those built for carrying capacity.

    The Compu is totally squared off, not a natural shape, and so not good for long hikes or daylong carrying, but carries scads of stuff. The Karachi is exactly the opposite.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • USAIRUSAIR Registered Users Posts: 2,646 Major grins
    edited June 30, 2006
    TylerW wrote:
    been eyeing the R-103 rucksack for about a week now to suit my photo backpack needs. No one I know carries them, and I hate buying stuff sight unseen, but the quality just looks to be absolutely top shelf with these guys. Anyone have any experience with them? Are they as stout as they look? Is getting to your gear a fussy affair? Are they comfortable enough for all-day wearability?

    Thanks in advance.

    I have had the 103 for a while now.
    Here's my review on it.

    The bag is one very tough bag very well padded.
    Very versatile you can change it to suit your needs.

    I have never taken the bag on long hikes so not sure how comfortable it would be.
    I don't use it that way.
    I usually carry all my stuff in it then kinda use it as a "base camp" take what I need out put it into another bag.(if that makes any sense)

    You just can't beat seeing and touching the bags before you buy.

    Hope that helps
    Fred
  • TylerWTylerW Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
    edited June 30, 2006
    Very good review, lots of good images showing how things work. After checking a few other reviews on FredMiranda, I'm thinking of the Kata R-103 over the Crumpler Whickey & cox. I like the general Crumpler business attitude, but the kata looks more versatile, more rugged, and I like its functionality and combat-inspired looks over the outdoorsey fashion sense of the Crumpler.

    Going to a photo expo/marketplace next weekend, hopefully will be able to get my hands on both there to reach a final decision. Thanks to everyone for the info! Its just more testament as to why this forum is such a fine place to rest my eyes.
    http://www.tylerwinegarner.com

    Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited June 30, 2006
    thumb.gif
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Sign In or Register to comment.