Kata bags: Opinion?
TylerW
Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
been eyeing the R-103 rucksack for about a week now to suit my photo backpack needs. No one I know carries them, and I hate buying stuff sight unseen, but the quality just looks to be absolutely top shelf with these guys. Anyone have any experience with them? Are they as stout as they look? Is getting to your gear a fussy affair? Are they comfortable enough for all-day wearability?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
http://www.tylerwinegarner.com
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
0
Comments
I didn't like them. Build quality did not feel good. Additional storage was meager and an afterthought. The bags felt cramped.
About the only thing I like was the second "hatch" giving access to your gear.
I was most unimpressed.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
I've been looking for a backpack that will hold a 30D with a 70-200 2.8L IS attached and a couple additional lenses - anyone have recommendations?
Thanks,
-Dante
________________________
http://troybn.smugmug.com/
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Check out www.cambags.com to see what the various choices can hold in the real world.
http://www.chrislaudermilkphoto.com/
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
I don't know if I need the full karachi outpost, but that Whickey ad Cox is looking better and better the more I see it. Its a fair amount to spend on a backpack, but I don't want to buy something and feel like I need to make apologies for it later.
Is it unreasonable to think I could fit a 10d w/a 70-200mm + 1.4exII tc, another (perhaps longer) zoom, such as a 100-400 L, plus a walkaround 28-80 in there?
Also, does it have any external loops, etc that I could clip a water bottle to via a carabiner?
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
The Compu is totally squared off, not a natural shape, and so not good for long hikes or daylong carrying, but carries scads of stuff. The Karachi is exactly the opposite.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
I have had the 103 for a while now.
Here's my review on it.
The bag is one very tough bag very well padded.
Very versatile you can change it to suit your needs.
I have never taken the bag on long hikes so not sure how comfortable it would be.
I don't use it that way.
I usually carry all my stuff in it then kinda use it as a "base camp" take what I need out put it into another bag.(if that makes any sense)
You just can't beat seeing and touching the bags before you buy.
Hope that helps
Fred
http://www.facebook.com/Riverbendphotos
Going to a photo expo/marketplace next weekend, hopefully will be able to get my hands on both there to reach a final decision. Thanks to everyone for the info! Its just more testament as to why this forum is such a fine place to rest my eyes.
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au