The Los Altos hills at sundown

TylerWTylerW Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
edited June 29, 2006 in Landscapes
Shot these at sunset this evening. First time shooting deliberately with a nearly-closed aperture. This one just got a bit of RAW luvvin' to get it where it is:

78274198-L.jpg

While this one took a bracketed exposure, some RAW curves tweaking, and a fair amount of photoshop and LAB color treatment.

78274199-L.jpg78303954-L-1.jpg

I'm pleased with the aesthetic simplicity of the first image, but its just that. I love the pop of the second, as well as using the tools aon hand to get that image where it is. my only worry is that I;ve gone too far, that its become too saturated, and just looks like a Disney film.

Disagree with me. Comments and crits welcome!
http://www.tylerwinegarner.com

Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L

Comments

  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,962 moderator
    edited June 28, 2006
    TylerW wrote:

    I'm pleased with the aesthetic simplicity of the first image, but its just that. I love the pop of the second, as well as using the tools aon hand to get that image where it is. my only worry is that I;ve gone too far, that its become too saturated, and just looks like a Disney film.

    Disagree with me. Comments and crits welcome!
    I used to work in that area--beautiful spot and great for photography, especially when there's a bit of fog around. I actually prefer the first shot. In #2 the halo around the sun looks quite green on my monitor and spoils an otherwise nice capture. FWIW.

    Regards,
  • TylerWTylerW Registered Users Posts: 428 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    rsinmadrid wrote:
    I used to work in that area--beautiful spot and great for photography, especially when there's a bit of fog around. I actually prefer the first shot. In #2 the halo around the sun looks quite green on my monitor and spoils an otherwise nice capture. FWIW.

    Regards,

    Yeah, it was a bit green once I looked at the rgb data. Made some tweaks and reuploaded, thanks for the catch!

    Looks like its time to calibrate the monitor again.11doh.gif
    http://www.tylerwinegarner.com

    Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    Very nice!
  • germaine_sbagermaine_sba Registered Users Posts: 120 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    I really like both shots, but the second appeals to me more. It's the color and the dried foliage. Congratulations! clap.gifclap.gifclap.gif
    Lord, keep my words sweet. Someday, I may have to eat them.
    http://www.germaine.smugmug.com
  • erich6erich6 Registered Users Posts: 1,638 Major grins
    edited June 28, 2006
    I don't like the blue tones on the first shot...I'd take those down a bit. Also, you didn't get enough of the foreground trees to enhance the sense of depth in the perspective which the haze adds to the shot. Otherwise I agree that the simplicity is appealing.

    The second one looks great in terms of colors and exposure. You did well in your post-processing. However, I find the distorted halo around the sun to be very distracting and ruins the shot. Also, a bit lower position would've helped to get more of the foreground bushes as a framing element.

    Erich
  • STLMach1STLMach1 Registered Users Posts: 152 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2006
    I like both shots. The sun seems a bit saturated in the second shot but other than that, beautiful. Great work!

    Michael
  • athosathos Registered Users Posts: 237 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2006
    i like the second better. the first has too much sky. but i am a big fan of layers of landscape all one hue fading away into white.

    besides the yellow halo around the sun being too much it looks great.
    www.simplyathos.com

    Gear
    *Canon 40D: 17-55IS - 70-300IS - 100mm Macro - Sigma 10-20EX
    *Imagination
Sign In or Register to comment.