Half Moon at 560mm (now with AF)
Nikolai
Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
I temporarily taped the pins on my 1.4 TC to see if it can gets my 30D's AF working on 100-400. Well, it did : (and I removed the tape to avoid AF grind).
Anyway - here is Half Moon Over SoCal, July 3, 2006.
I also went for some unnatural, but IMHO interesting angle.
Hope you guys like it! :wink
Cheers! :1drink
Anyway - here is Half Moon Over SoCal, July 3, 2006.
I also went for some unnatural, but IMHO interesting angle.
Hope you guys like it! :wink
Cheers! :1drink
"May the f/stop be with you!"
0
Comments
Canon 5D Mk.2/Grip || Canon 7D Backup
17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS || 100mm f/2.8L Macro || 24-70mm f/2.8L
Wedding Photographer
www.cwphotos.net
Yeah, me too :-) One of them 600mm :-)
Cheers!
- Kevin
I need to go with lower ISO, though, 1600 is a bit too noisy..
However, I tried it last night from the tripod (boorowed a collar:-) and found it insanely difficult to focus manually. I got a rather clear, low-noise shot at ISO100, f/10 at /10th (tripod, MLU, remote shutter), but it was very soft... :cry
And the moon was already gone so I could not take another one.. Oh well, maybe tonight, after the fireworks :-)
You guys get fireworks on 3d, too? Nice
Oh well, I need to learn a better focusing in manual, I guess
Have a great 4th!
We had fireworks on the 30th,1st,2nd,3rd, and now on the 4th
its raining cats and dogs now but i but I bet some hillbilly (I included myself) will figure a way to shoot a few more off today.
I love this holiday
Thanks
Fred
http://www.facebook.com/Riverbendphotos
Thanks, glad you like it!
In our little place we only get them on 4th itself
However, it comes with the clear blue skies and low 90ies. It's this weather that you makes you very glad you paid all those $$$ to maintain your own swimming pool...
Must be nice! I gotta get out of this desert!!!:cry (that's not tears...it's sweat!) HEHE.
- Kevin
You and Kendall (he's in Mojave) must be getting 110+ these days..
I mean, I like warm weather, but not that warm
Agreed! I'm really looking at relocating - this is getting old very fast. I'm looking for a new position but I think we're stuck here another year until my wife finishes school.
Oh well.:cry :cry :cry
- Kevin
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
I wish I could do better (and I hope I will), but this is but best result for now.
In fact, I think I will reattach the tape, but will focus manually. This way I will get the focus confirmation signal (beep/rect flash) and won't grind the AF gear to the gound...
Got any BBQ today?
Cheerio!
That's a great idea! Of coarse, you knew that already!:D
- Kevin
I wonder why I didn't think of this in the first place Focusing manually at the object located at 200,000+ miles is not an easy task, and for some reason I could never focus hyperfocally with this lens (even though I made myself a very cool busines-card sized cheatsheet of hyperfocal distances for the most common focal f/stops and distances:
Anyway, glad you liked the idea (I mean tape + manual). And, seriously, putting the tape on second time was like hitting the spacebar - very easy, you can't miss it :-)
Cheers!
Now with the tripod (although very lame-entry-level tripod, I do need to get a better one :bash).
ISO100, f/11 at 1/5th. TC with taped pins, focused manually, used AF to confirm the focus.
Regardless of the MLU, the whole rig (30D + 100-400 + TC) is too heavy for the tripod, hence the image is way too soft. :cry
Although much less noisy/grainy than the previous version.:D
Anyways, for what it's worth...