Help me break down my cognitive dissonance

MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
edited July 10, 2006 in Accessories
I think I am nearing pulling the trigger for my first L series lens, the Canon EF 200mm f/2.8. I have been needing a decent telephoto lens for a while now. I can't tell you how many cool wildlife shots I have missed. Even though I do mostly close up shots of the kids and plants and such, I see the need for a good telephoto as the kids get older and start in sports and other activities.

So am I doing the right thing? I know, very subjective...

Comments

  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited July 8, 2006
    Of course you are....hey its a very saleable item if you dont like it also.
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited July 8, 2006
    If you're thinking about shooting wildlife, you should also consider the 1.4 extender. 200 isn't really that much reach.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • Duffy PrattDuffy Pratt Registered Users Posts: 260 Major grins
    edited July 8, 2006
    That's the way it starts. Just one L lens. But after the 200 2.8, you will wonder how you could do with the 400 5.6, or the 70-200 with IS. And then you will know that those wide shots would be alot better with the 35 1.4.

    So yes, you are doing the right thing. But don't think this one is going to be your only L lens.

    Duffy
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited July 8, 2006
    wxwax wrote:
    If you're thinking about shooting wildlife, you should also consider the 1.4 extender. 200 isn't really that much reach.

    That is next on the the list. I realized going into this that 200mm would not give me all the reach that I wanted but I just couldn't afford the some of the bigger L lenses. Well, maybe I could have, but, being the child at heart that I am, mwink.gif I didn't want to wait to save that much money. So that extender is definitely going to be purchase and some time.
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited July 8, 2006
    That's the way it starts. Just one L lens. But after the 200 2.8, you will wonder how you could do with the 400 5.6, or the 70-200 with IS. And then you will know that those wide shots would be alot better with the 35 1.4.

    So yes, you are doing the right thing. But don't think this one is going to be your only L lens.

    Duffy

    Oh no, I fear I have started something I might not want. rolleyes1.gif
  • KhaosKhaos Registered Users Posts: 2,435 Major grins
    edited July 8, 2006
    Yes, once you travel down the L road, there is no turning back. Some even cross over into the dreaded Zeiss pit of despair.:D

    Seriously though, as an avid animal and nature photographer whose first L was the 70-200 2.8 IS L, 200 is no where near enough length.

    Think about the 300 4.0 IS L with an extender or the 400 5.6 L. Buy used. I did with no regrets.
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,938 moderator
    edited July 8, 2006
    I think the used market is just fine. Be the way to get long glass
    for less money. You'll be wishing for the 500 like I wish for the
    600 :D


    Ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    My dissonance or indecisiveness
    is getting the best of me. Anyhow, after doing even more reading on the subject, I decided that wanted a telephoto zoom lens instead of one of fixed focal length, so I cancelled the previous order and ordered the EF 70-200L f/4 series telephoto zoom. And yes, the extender is the next purchase. :D It should be here just in time for a trip to the Texas Hill Country. I should have plenty of time to try it out. thumb.gif Of course, since I can't afford the IS versions, I am going to be ordering a tripod soon as well.
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    Khaos wrote:
    Yes, once you travel down the L road, there is no turning back. Some even cross over into the dreaded Zeiss pit of despair.:D

    Seriously though, as an avid animal and nature photographer whose first L was the 70-200 2.8 IS L, 200 is no where near enough length.

    Think about the 300 4.0 IS L with an extender or the 400 5.6 L. Buy used. I did with no regrets.

    I think I will have to buy used for my next purchases. I can't keep doing this and pay all the bills. :D
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    ian408 wrote:
    I think the used market is just fine. Be the way to get long glass
    for less money. You'll be wishing for the 500 like I wish for the
    600 :D


    Ian

    Lens lust needs to be listed with AMA as an official disease or condition. rolleyes1.gif
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,938 moderator
    edited July 9, 2006
    Maestro wrote:
    I think I will have to buy used for my next purchases. I can't keep doing this and pay all the bills. :D

    Wait until you think about truly big glass :D
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    Maestro wrote:
    is getting the best of me. Anyhow, after doing even more reading on the subject, I decided that wanted a telephoto zoom lens instead of one of fixed focal length, so I cancelled the previous order and ordered the EF 70-200L f/4 series telephoto zoom. And yes, the extender is the next purchase. :D It should be here just in time for a trip to the Texas Hill Country. I should have plenty of time to try it out. thumb.gif Of course, since I can't afford the IS versions, I am going to be ordering a tripod soon as well.
    I think that's an excellent decision. I was going to sugges a 70-200, but was cognizant of your budget issues.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    wxwax wrote:
    I think that's an excellent decision. I was going to sugges a 70-200, but was cognizant of your budget issues.

    Phew! There are just so many decision to be made because they are so many lenses from which to choose. It's can get mind-boggling. It's enough to drive one to drink. :booze
  • claudermilkclaudermilk Registered Users Posts: 2,756 Major grins
    edited July 10, 2006
    Maestro wrote:
    Lens lust needs to be listed with AMA as an official disease or condition. rolleyes1.gif

    Yeah, it's called Lcoholism. No meetings for it though since none of us would attend anyway. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.