Faster, better cards

luckyrweluckyrwe Registered Users Posts: 952 Major grins
edited July 11, 2006 in Accessories
It looks like the Extreme III cards are on the way out and the Extreme IV is the way to go now....

Comments

  • mrlartermrlarter Registered Users Posts: 90 Big grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    Iam currently just using a normal scandisk 1 gig card in my little rebel. I am getting a 30D as of tomorrow so obviously need a new card. What are the prices looking like?
    Brian Larter
    brianlarter.com
    aperturestudios.ca

    weapon of choice: Canon 40D
    BG-E2 Battery Grip
    50mm f/1.8 MK 1
    28-135mm IS USM f/3.5-5.6
    17-40mm L USM f/4.0
  • luckyrweluckyrwe Registered Users Posts: 952 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2006
    MSRP is listed on that site, it sure beats what I paid for my 8GB card a year ago!
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,938 moderator
    edited July 9, 2006
    You can get a sense for pricing by using NexTag.com or some similar
    service.

    Beware that not all on-line vendors offer similar service though. You
    might want to look at resellerratings.com too.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • mikey7mikey7 Registered Users Posts: 4 Beginner grinner
    edited July 11, 2006
    I did some research on this and found evidence supporting my theory. Most cameras can not write/read that fast.

    Sandisk Extreme III can do 20MB/sec, but most SLRs can only do 5-6MB/sec.



    I also think the bigger the card, the slower it writes after 1/2 full. FAT and FAT32 isn't that efficient. No evidence yet.. ne_nau.gif

    http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,938 moderator
    edited July 11, 2006
    Mikey,

    In a sense I agree with you but remember, that you're buying those cards
    not just for today but for future cameras as well. So what you want to do
    (IMHO) is find something that's a good compromise for today's need but that
    will carry you into your next camera too. That means finding speed and
    memory size that meet those needs.

    Ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • Red BullRed Bull Registered Users Posts: 719 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2006
    So will this bring the price of Extreme III's down? Or even the Extreme II's. I'd be happy even with an 8 or 4gb Extreme II if I could get it for not too much.
    -Steven

    http://redbull.smugmug.com

    "Money can't buy happiness...But it can buy expensive posessions that make other people envious, and that feels just as good.":D

    Canon 20D, Canon 50 1.8 II, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40 f/4 L, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Canon 430ex.
  • PezpixPezpix Registered Users Posts: 391 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2006
    Speed is only an issue for me when shooting 8.5 frames per second at sporting events. And of course, while shooting raw, its nice to have some extra speed kick in when my camera is processing. But for me, I'd like to see a bigger size card more than insane speeds.

    If the rumors are true about Canon's 1DsMarkIII and its 22 megapixel toting body, I couldnt even imagine how I could shoot more than 250 raw photos with an 8 gig card. And of course, forget about shooting many picutures with that H2D-39 megapixel large format bad boy from Hassleblad (I know, i know, its got its own hard drive Laughing.gif )

    Gimme space not speed!!!
    Professional Ancient Smugmug Shutter Geek
    Master Of Sushi Noms
    Amateur CSS Dork
  • Duffy PrattDuffy Pratt Registered Users Posts: 260 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2006
    Buying for your next camera seems shortsighted to me. The cards are dropping in price and increasing in speed much faster than the specs on any camera. So if you buy now for something you will use a few years from now, you will just be overpaying.

    Example, I bought my 20D a year ago, and then, 1 gig cards were going for appox $100. If I had bought a 4 gig card then, it would have cost somewhere around $450-500, and more like $700. Instead, I finally bought a 4 gig last month for $140, and its faster than the 1 gig I bought last year. And in the last month, the price on the four gig has dropped to about $90.

    By the time I get my next camera, there will probably be even faster 32 gig cards that go for about $100. So I think its a bad idea to dump money now for performance that a camera cannot even use.

    Duffy
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2006
    I'll second that...
    ...
    The cards are dropping in price and increasing in speed much faster than the specs on any camera. So if you buy now for something you will use a few years from now, you will just be overpaying.
    ...
    Duffy

    Media market is way hotter and way more dynamic than dslr's.
    Cards get bigger, faster and cheaper with a noticeable change period being every 9 months or so (talking Moor's Law Squared:-).

    Cheers, y'all!1drink.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited July 11, 2006
    Buying for your next camera seems shortsighted to me. The cards are dropping in price and increasing in speed much faster than the specs on any camera. So if you buy now for something you will use a few years from now, you will just be overpaying.
    Agreed. Buying a memory card is not the same as buying a lens. Buy a lens for the future because they don't wear out and they don't go obsolete. So buying the better lens than you need today makes sense. But memory prices drop too quickly. By the time you **need** that faster memory card that faster memory card will be half the price that you originally paid for it. You are spending money in a way that brings no additional value you to you.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
Sign In or Register to comment.