My first hummingbird. ;)
Had my first hummingbirds comming in to feeder today .. and i cought a few snaps..
but i just can't get them to pop.. lighting was tough overcast,under the eve of house kinda in a corner.. mostly i just brightened and slight sharpen.. and any help for a rookie would be appreciated .. eq. 20d,70-200 2.8 at 200mm ap3.5 shutter ? no flash..
but i just can't get them to pop.. lighting was tough overcast,under the eve of house kinda in a corner.. mostly i just brightened and slight sharpen.. and any help for a rookie would be appreciated .. eq. 20d,70-200 2.8 at 200mm ap3.5 shutter ? no flash..
0
Comments
Thanks for sharing.
Dick.
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
My Gallery
anyway, if i was in your place id probably have increased exposure compensation.... i dont like to use fill flash on birds, it scares them i think...but i guarantee you this.....
the more you practice the better your pictures get!
troy
the 70-200 IMHO is long enough, but of course the extra reach is nice...
troy
the hummingbirds are somewhat predictable, they land , they hover, they land etc..... make sure you use a monopod or lean against something to brace yourself...
troy
I suspect one of your problems is camera shake. Many people don’t realize how little movement it takes to make the edges in a photo blur. We are talking only a few ten-thousandth of an inch. On a Canon 20D the sensor is 0.885mm or 0.590 inches wide, and across the sensor is 3,504 pixels. That means there is a pixel every 0.00025 of an inch. If your sensor, or the image on the sensor, moves just 25 ten-thousandth of an inch you have a one pixel wide blur. If it moves 25 one-thousandth of an inch, you have a ten pixel blur and that is more than a tenth of an inch on my monitor (Sony 17” 87 pixels per inch).
The flash helps because the shutter speed effectively becomes the flash duration, and that tends to be much faster than the 1/500 sec you used. I don’t understand your exif data because it says your focal length was equivalent to 777mm (on 35mm full frame), yet it shows a true focal length of 200mm. I thought the 20D had a factor of about 1.6, which would make 200mm the equivalent of 320mm.
The other is exposure. Your pictures are too dark.
The picture you displayed is rather small, but I adjusted the Levels, D-Lighting, USM, and added a Color Control Point, and I think it looks better.
Here is a Hummer taken under the eaves of our house, using a flash. Humming birds don’t seem to be bothered by the flash, yes they jump a little, but no more than they do at the sound of the shutter. At least that is my experience. After a few shots, they pretty much ignore you.
220mm Focal Length, 800 ISO, 1/500 @ F/14, SunPak 383 flash
like others a fill flash would of been big time help. Animals do not fear flash it may startle them at 1st, and that's a good sign because it's telling you your flash is to strong turn it down. The best compliment you can receive on fill flash is when your viewers don't know you used it.
Since you said you were just starting, then might I suggest skipping the feeder route and planting the kind of succulents which attract your intended subject.
JMHO mind you but I think feeders "suck" . To me they kill the look of an otherwise slendid image.
This is what you can shot just with some stealth and patience. No other special set up used
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
Check this out!
http://www.rpphoto.com/howto/hummer/humguide1.asp
troy
Excellent link
But what to do you want broken??
My Galleries
Flicker
G+