Skyscrapers the Sky and the past
Prezwoodz
Registered Users Posts: 1,147 Major grins
This is how I see a place such as this. Missing what once was there and replaced with steel.
Taken in Chicago the tall building is the Sears Tower.
Taken in Chicago the tall building is the Sears Tower.
My Pictures can be seen at http://prezwoodz.smugmug.com
I Live at http://www.alaskamountainforum.com
I Live at http://www.alaskamountainforum.com
0
Comments
Was that frosted glass you shot through or a layer you added?
I'm getting the concept but I'm not sold on the capture being that strong. It's muted and washed out. The sky is blown out and there is a lack of sharpness that bugs me. Perhaps I'm biased though as that is my hometown skyline and I might just be extra critical of a subject I'm so familiar with.
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
Personally, I think it would work better on a different scale.
i.e.; One or two buildings with tree outline in a proportionate scale.
:thumb
http://imagesinsurfphotography.smugmug.com/
TomsProPhoto
I really do like the current skyline (and I am like a tree hugger), but the current skyline is strong as a photo, IMO. Now if you could just find that vacant lot with one tree on it surrounded by bldgs, smile.
ginger
http://avatars.imvu.com/sayntbrigidii
My Gallery
Jamie