Is the lens I dropped repairable?

JohnnyJrJohnnyJr Registered Users Posts: 174 Major grins
edited July 28, 2006 in Cameras
I could really use some advice about my damaged 50mm 1.4. I dropped it this morning and it hit the ground hard on its side. Now it won’t focus. When it turn it over from end to end I can feel a heavy solid object sliding up and down freely inside the lens barrel. Feels like one of those cow-in-a-can things but without the ‘moo’! My questions are:
1) Is it likely to be repairable and what’s Canon gonna charge me;
2) If I do get it fixed will it ever actually be right again;
3) Should I just replace it and be more careful.

I’ve never dropped any piece of photo gear before which is pretty amazing considering I’m a big klutz. For once I’m glad that the build on this lens is so cheap because it will cost >only< $300 to replace, which could be worse I guess.

Any thoughts fellow lens droppers?
Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.

http://www.sissonphotography.com
www.flickr.com/photos/sissonphotography
http://sissonphotography.blogspot.com/

Comments

  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited July 27, 2006
    If it were me, I'd send it off to Canon. They'll tell you how much a repair will cost. Then you can decide whether or not it's worth it.
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • mrlartermrlarter Registered Users Posts: 90 Big grins
    edited July 27, 2006
    I've been told that the only lenses really worth repairing is if the lens is over $750. anything else the repair costs close to the actual cost and theres alwaysa chance with any damage that the glass may be scratched.
    Brian Larter
    brianlarter.com
    aperturestudios.ca

    weapon of choice: Canon 40D
    BG-E2 Battery Grip
    50mm f/1.8 MK 1
    28-135mm IS USM f/3.5-5.6
    17-40mm L USM f/4.0
  • SeefutlungSeefutlung Registered Users Posts: 2,781 Major grins
    edited July 27, 2006
    If it can't be repaired maybe Canon can fit some type of noise maker over one of the ends ... so when it's tipped .. it mooos.
    My snaps can be found here:
    Unsharp at any Speed
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited July 27, 2006
    My 50/1.4 was also dropped onto the sidewalk and stopped working. The focus ring would only extend the lens about halfway. I sent it to Canon, they charged me $85 (plus shipping), and I had it back from NJ in about 2 weeks. It seems to be not QUITE the same as new (slight squeeks when extending and focus seems a TAD slower than before), so I may send it back. If I had waited to drop it until after I got my State Farm camera insurance, it would have cost me shipping only, IIRC. By all means, send it in. You won't know anything concrete until you do.
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,078 moderator
    edited July 28, 2006
    TristanP wrote:
    ... You won't know anything concrete until you do.

    I bet "concrete" is partly how he got into this predicament. rolleyes1.gif

    ziggy53
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • JohnnyJrJohnnyJr Registered Users Posts: 174 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    I've actually got a State Farm policy on this lens and the rest of my gear. I didn't figure it was worth filing a claim for this lens but maybe I should look into it. It sounds like they will cover the repair cost from what you're saying. However, my concern is what you've described, that it won't ever be the same again after it is repaired...
    TristanP wrote:
    My 50/1.4 was also dropped onto the sidewalk and stopped working. The focus ring would only extend the lens about halfway. I sent it to Canon, they charged me $85 (plus shipping), and I had it back from NJ in about 2 weeks. It seems to be not QUITE the same as new (slight squeeks when extending and focus seems a TAD slower than before), so I may send it back. If I had waited to drop it until after I got my State Farm camera insurance, it would have cost me shipping only, IIRC. By all means, send it in. You won't know anything concrete until you do.
    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.
    Jake: Hit it.

    http://www.sissonphotography.com
    www.flickr.com/photos/sissonphotography
    http://sissonphotography.blogspot.com/
  • JohnnyJrJohnnyJr Registered Users Posts: 174 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    That would actually be a pretty cool gag item, wouldn't it?
    Seefutlung wrote:
    If it can't be repaired maybe Canon can fit some type of noise maker over one of the ends ... so when it's tipped .. it mooos.
    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.
    Jake: Hit it.

    http://www.sissonphotography.com
    www.flickr.com/photos/sissonphotography
    http://sissonphotography.blogspot.com/
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    Is it just your homeowner's policy or a specific Inland Marine policy covering camera gear (like I have)? If it's just your homeowners, I'd hesitate on claiming such a small item. A new lens is only ~$300. The repair should be fine, but you won't know until you send it in.
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • JohnnyJrJohnnyJr Registered Users Posts: 174 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    It is a seperate "personal articles" policy specifically for the camera gear... does that sound like what you have through Stare Farm? They said it covers any loss or damage to the gear (including a gravity incident like this one) but I've always wondered what would happen in this type of situation if I actually did file a claim. In this case I won't but I still wonder. My policy is up for renewal so if you have any insurance advice I'd love to hear it!
    TristanP wrote:
    Is it just your homeowner's policy or a specific Inland Marine policy covering camera gear (like I have)? If it's just your homeowners, I'd hesitate on claiming such a small item. A new lens is only ~$300. The repair should be fine, but you won't know until you send it in.
    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.
    Jake: Hit it.

    http://www.sissonphotography.com
    www.flickr.com/photos/sissonphotography
    http://sissonphotography.blogspot.com/
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    Sounds exactly like my policy. I wouldn't hesitate to file that claim - it's why you bought the insurance, right? That will determine whether it's worth renewing, too.
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • JohnnyJrJohnnyJr Registered Users Posts: 174 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    Good point, Tristan!
    TristanP wrote:
    Sounds exactly like my policy. I wouldn't hesitate to file that claim - it's why you bought the insurance, right? That will determine whether it's worth renewing, too.
    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.
    Jake: Hit it.

    http://www.sissonphotography.com
    www.flickr.com/photos/sissonphotography
    http://sissonphotography.blogspot.com/
  • John MuellerJohn Mueller Registered Users Posts: 2,555 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    JohnnyJr wrote:
    It is a seperate "personal articles" policy specifically for the camera gear... does that sound like what you have through Stare Farm? They said it covers any loss or damage to the gear (including a gravity incident like this one) but I've always wondered what would happen in this type of situation if I actually did file a claim. In this case I won't but I still wonder. My policy is up for renewal so if you have any insurance advice I'd love to hear it!

    I have that policy.

    I met a fellow photog who happened to be an agent.
    He said be careful with your claims.2-3 and they drop you.
    So,if it were me,I would do out of pocket and save claims for the larger $
  • SpeshulEdSpeshulEd Registered Users Posts: 341 Major grins
    edited July 28, 2006
    2-3 claims and they drop you? You're paying for the insurance, thats what its there for, to me that doesn't make sense that they'd drop you if you claimed a few things. ne_nau.gif I don't doubt you, I just find it rediculous.

    I think I'd call call your insurance company and Canon just to see what they'd suggest. If canon says they can fix it and your insurance company doesn't mind covering it (which they shouldn't cuz thats what you pay them for), then I'd go for it. If it doesn't work to your liking in the end, you can sell it as is for cheap.
    bored? check out my photo site...and if you have the time, leave a comment or rate some pictures while you're there.
    Canon 20D | Canon 17-40mm f/4L USM | Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di LD IF | Canon 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
Sign In or Register to comment.