IR wthout filters???
crow
Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
Is it possible to IR an ordinary photography (via photoshop) without having to buy the IR & ND filters ?
I have a Sony 828 and I think I might be falling under the IR spell, but my wallet is saying NOOOOO!!
I have a Sony 828 and I think I might be falling under the IR spell, but my wallet is saying NOOOOO!!
jfghckgvlhyvluijhb;ijol m,lll
0
Comments
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
UUUUUh....I think Fred Miranda has an IR plug in.....haven't used it.....
With Photoshop (or any other decent image-processing software) it is possible to mimic infra-red black-and-white and colour images from regular colour photos. You can mimic the white rendition of living foliage (Wood effect), the dark rendition of blue sky, the higher contrast of IR shots, and the halos and the coarse grain of many IR films. You can also mimic the false colour rendition of colour IR film. You cannot, however, mimic the ability of real infra-red shots to penetrate haze and fog, or only to a minor degree.
Haven't tried it myself yet, but I guess some of the techniques presented in Dan Margulis' book Photoshop Lab Color should be helpful to create convincing counterfeited infra-red images from regular colour photos. Also Photoshop's channel mixer should be helpful. In any case, it requires some effort, skill, and practice to get it right. Using an IR filter and taking real infra-red photographs sure is easier.
Here is an example of a counterfeited 'IR image' created in Photoshop from a regular RGB file. Of course, it's a poor example; it was my first try, and a quick'n'dirty one. Skilled photoshoppers will come up with much better work:
And here is, for comparison, a real IR image, taken with Minolta SR-T 101 and a 50-mm lens on Konica IR 750 film using a RG-695 (Wratten #89B) filter:
-- Olaf
It's no substitute for the real thing, though.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
your right, there is no substitute. I guess photoshop cant do "everything"