small with RAW?
Does anyone have advice about the possibility of finding a good small camera (one that would fit in the side pocket of a sports coat) that shoots in the RAW format?
I have a fine DSLR (Nikon D200), but I am often in a situation where carrying it is a hassle. So a nice pocket size camera as a backup / auxiliary / handy carry-everywhere would be nice. And I would like it to handle the RAW format, since I like doing post-processing.
I suppose that wanting a pocket sized camera as a handy sidekick is rational, while also wanting it to handle RAW is irrational. But I hope that others will indulge me and pardon my quirks. I would appreciate any (charitable?) advice.
Thanks,
I have a fine DSLR (Nikon D200), but I am often in a situation where carrying it is a hassle. So a nice pocket size camera as a backup / auxiliary / handy carry-everywhere would be nice. And I would like it to handle the RAW format, since I like doing post-processing.
I suppose that wanting a pocket sized camera as a handy sidekick is rational, while also wanting it to handle RAW is irrational. But I hope that others will indulge me and pardon my quirks. I would appreciate any (charitable?) advice.
Thanks,
0
Comments
and a nice Leica 28-112mm (35mm equiv) lens too.
I dont know if other versions of the Lumix know RAW.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0607/06071904panasoniclx2.asp
― Edward Weston
I did a features search on dpreview.com and came up these, hope this helps
Ed
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp
http://www.dogshome.org.au/
Link doesn't seem to work m8.
― Edward Weston
Worked for me again, anyway i think Lash would have gotten the idea
Ed
http://www.dogshome.org.au/
Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
Another good feature of the Sxx series is full manual control over both shutter speed and aperture.
However, I can vouch for Raw being desirable in a point-and-shoot to get the absolute most out of the camera's limits. I do not like the JPEGs from the S60. I really wish there were more point-and-shoots that did Raw.
The only small Panasonic Lumixes that do RAW is the current LX1 (8mp) and the upcoming LX2 (10mp). The first might be a bit noisy in JPEG, but the second will have a Venus III engine to deal with noise in JPEGs. If that's an advantage, I don't know, since I prefer noise over smeared images. I haven't seen a RAW file of the LX2 yet, so I can't comment on the quality of those. The LX1 is also available in a Leica coat as the D-Lux 2, so it is probably not wrong to assume the LX2 will be available after some time as a D-Lux 3 or something like that.
Also Olympus has some smaller cameras (but definitely not tiny) that do RAW, like the SP350. And then there's the Fuji E900.
All cameras mentioned probably have their strong and weak points. So do a little research, and compare them on the points that matter most to you.
Here are a few on eBay..a bargain for what that camera can do !!
It does a nice job with macro shots when you use the "super macro mode" and has reasonable low light performance (I was using to take pictures of shelter animals inside and could usually get at least one decent shot).
Some pictures from the c-5050:
Mary
Thanks to all for the helpful replies. : I will do my research now, and see what fits my psyche.
Yes; I got the idea. And I tried various criteria in the features search, so that gives me some ideas.
But I also want to know about DGrinners personal experiences with this type of camera, so I am also grateful for those who posted comments about their own experiences. :