wxwax wrote: #2 definitely works for me. All the right bits are in focus and stand out against the background.
MaleficZ wrote: Those look great! I take it you're using a macro lens?
Dick on Aruba wrote: Nice series Wally. I like the 3th the most. Thanks for sharing. Dick.
Harryb wrote: :yikes Outstanding set.
Dalantech wrote: Well done Wally!!! It's funny -I can shoot spiders, but as I'm walking away my skin starts to crawl :uhoh
raptorcaptor wrote: Nice photos Wally! I like #2 best, but I would have preferred the crop not to cut off the bottom leg.
Comments
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
\Ma*lef"ic\, a. Doing mischief; causing harm or evil; hurtful
Thanks for sharing.
Dick.
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
It's funny -I can shoot spiders, but as I'm walking away my skin starts to crawl :uhoh
Looking for tips on macro photography? Check out my Blog: No Cropping Zone.
Thanks wxwax, I appreciate it!!!
Thanks MaleficZ, yeah I am using a Sig 150 2.8 ex on a canon 20d
Thanks so much Dick!
, Dalantech, I know zactly what ya mean!!!
My website | NANPA Member
Thanks Glenn, I agree, not my best framing job for sure.
Thanks for sharing,
Joan
Photo gallery: http://jbarnett.smugmug.com