Should I send my lens to canon?
I have a 28-105mm lens that has some dust on the inner elements. Now the lens is out of warranty and this would cost money. The zoom ring is also very loose and it almost looks like some of the lube has leaked out around the seal. The lens is cheap ($100ish) so im wondering what will be more cost effective.
Suggestions? :scratch
Suggestions? :scratch
====My Gear=====
Canon 5D Mk.2/Grip || Canon 7D Backup
17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS || 100mm f/2.8L Macro || 24-70mm f/2.8L
Wedding Photographer
www.cwphotos.net
Canon 5D Mk.2/Grip || Canon 7D Backup
17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS || 100mm f/2.8L Macro || 24-70mm f/2.8L
Wedding Photographer
www.cwphotos.net
0
Comments
http://redbull.smugmug.com
"Money can't buy happiness...But it can buy expensive posessions that make other people envious, and that feels just as good.":D
Canon 20D, Canon 50 1.8 II, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40 f/4 L, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Canon 430ex.
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Canon 5D Mk.2/Grip || Canon 7D Backup
17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS || 100mm f/2.8L Macro || 24-70mm f/2.8L
Wedding Photographer
www.cwphotos.net
Try sticking a piece of tape 1 mm in diameter on a filter about half way off the center axis, and then shot some frames with that. Not really that much happens. And a 1mm spot on a filter is vastly larger than some dust motes.
If there are a significant amount of dust motes between the elements, they will contribute to a loss of resolution and contrast, but not discrete dust spots in the image files themselves.
For spots in the image files, I would look carefully for dust on your sensor. Shoot a few frames at f22 focused on an evenly illuminated sky in RAW, open the file into Photoshop, and do an Auto Adjust for contrast and see if you do not see all kinds of grunge on your sensor.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin