Stillness
athos
Registered Users Posts: 237 Major grins
didn't have time to drive to shoot what i want to until the weekend, so i messed about near to home.
A Still Perch
Incoming Stillness
A Still Perch
Incoming Stillness
0
Comments
TomsProPhoto
That's an incredible capture and comp. It looks like he has hands and is busy at work like a surgical technician. Very impressive!
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
douglas
I'm curious, what lens did you use for those?
Ben
thanks.
the first shot was the canon 70-300IS wide open. it would have been sharper if i didnt move forward a touch after focusing and recomposing. i was in a field next to a burned out building that the fireman use for practice to shoot a fire hydrant in the middle of a grassy field when i saw this fellow perch perfectly still for half a minute. i wish i was a bit smarter on adjusting my settings.
the second is with the sigma 105mm macro also wide open.
i went easy on the PP for the first: cropping, levels, little bit of unsharp mask, a bit of color enhancement. the second i used levels more robustly to darken the green leaves in the background of the flower bud.
i did use the free noiseware application at the very end.
they came out nice out of camera left me with not too much to do.
Gear
*Canon 40D: 17-55IS - 70-300IS - 100mm Macro - Sigma 10-20EX
*Imagination
There is nothing best then 1st one for stillness
My Gallery
Now everyone's trying to sell the sigma 105mm macro to me!
I started off convinced on the canon 100mm macro vs the other ones...
First the camera shop doesn't have the canon 100mm macro, so they showed me the sigma 105mm macro...
And now you are showing me one of your pics from the sigma 105mm... Bah!!!
Well, any ways... thanks for sharing! nice pics!
Ben
there are pros and cons to it. big pro is the price over the canon macro. it is 370 at sigma4less.com it is very very sharp, with amazing contrast and colors out of camera. it has a nice 13" min focusing distance which gives u some room to work.
some cons, focusing is loud. focusing is also very slow when you go from macro to non-macro shooting - it cycles through the whole barrel, and not fast. once you get it back to full range focusing, focusing is pretty quick. in low light though, when you have to focus it hunts and going through all that range takes what feels like forever. also the barrel extends, which doesnt bother me, but it does some people.
if you are going to use this for mostly macro, with some portrait shooting, this lens is great. if you are going to utilize it for less than 50% macro shooting and a lot of walkaround stuff, id go canon.
here are a few more shots from this lens, what is great is i barely have to touch the colors in pp. they come out insane.
Gear
*Canon 40D: 17-55IS - 70-300IS - 100mm Macro - Sigma 10-20EX
*Imagination
Now I've handled the sigma, and it does seem to run quite nicely, though it did seem quite slow...
Now I just wish someplace had the canon such that I could pick it up and try it out...
How fast is the canon compared to the sigma, The Canon has a ring USM with full time manual right?
Anyway, I suppose this is all off-topic isn't it
Perhaps we should get back to the challenge discussion
Ben
yeah it has the fast and quiet ring usm and FTM focusing. the sigma uses a clutch. but like i said, for macro stuff, i dont find any of that a bother, it becomes second nature, and its not even my lens.
canon should be noticeably faster. basically, if the $100 difference (349.95 for a sigma w/canon mount at sigma4less vs 449.95 for the canon at b&H) means little to you, then get the canon for sure.
Gear
*Canon 40D: 17-55IS - 70-300IS - 100mm Macro - Sigma 10-20EX
*Imagination
clap
http://avatars.imvu.com/sayntbrigidii
www.pixappeal.smugmug.com
My website | NANPA Member