Canon 20D CSpro Plugin from FM
What do y'all think about this? With the 20D I don't think I'm in need of neat image anymore, so I stumbled across this. Worth the $$$$ ???
http://www.fredmiranda.com/shopping/20DCSpro
Thanks
http://www.fredmiranda.com/shopping/20DCSpro
Thanks
0
Comments
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
andy
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
I'm not all that impressed with the sample images, though. They compare a RAW file (no sharpening) with an "unsharp mask" version, but no info on settings for the USM. It's oversharp...guessing 100% w/ 2.5 pixel radius. feh.
what's the scoopage, andy? worth 25 clams?
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=4248
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
I've used the CSpro 10D plug-in for about 8 months, with great luck (on both PS Elements 2.0 and PS CS). I also upgraded to the "new" 10D plug-in 2-3 months ago, when it first came out. Now that I have a 20D, I will definitely get the 20D plug-in.
Not only does the CSpro plug-in work better than Unsharp Mask in lots of situations, but probably its biggest selling point is its ease of use. It offers enough "customization" options to provide a lot of flexibility, but isn't as inscruitable as Unsharp Mask. (that is, the learning curve is nowhere near as steep)
Once you buy the initial plug-in, Fred Miranda is quite good about offering upgrade discounts to current customers. I think I got the 10D plug-in upgrade for under $12 and he's offering the 20D plug-in to owners of the 10D plug-in at a good discount (25%?) for the first 2-3 weeks.
In my book, it's a "no-brainer" great value.
Supported by: Benro C-298 Flexpod tripod, MC96 monopod, Induro PHQ1 head
Also play with: studio strobes, umbrellas, softboxes, ...and a partridge in a pear tree...
Andy: Thanks for the mini-review......appreciated
http://lonepine.shutterbugstorefront.com
If you're referring to "sharpness" -- Virtually all images from digital cameras require some sharpening before printing. This is especially true for images from dSLRs that normally have in-camera sharpening cranked down, compared to Point & Shoot digicams. The more "pro" the dSLR, the lower the default in-camera sharpening setting is. For example [thanks, Fish, for the info!] n the Canon line, the default in-camera sharpening moves progressively lower as one moves from Digital Rebel to 10D/20D to 1D/1Ds.
Sharpening on your Mac/PC is more effective (and certainly can be wielded with much finer control) than in the camera. If sharpness is important, the way to get the sharpest possible photo (assuming a JPG file) is to turn in-camera sharpening completely off (or at least, to its lowest setting) and perform sharpening wth your favorite image-editing program.
The CSpro plug-in discussed in this thread can make that chore easier (and as Andy attests, often better) than Photoshop's more general-purpose Unsharp Mask sharpening tool).
= bug.
Supported by: Benro C-298 Flexpod tripod, MC96 monopod, Induro PHQ1 head
Also play with: studio strobes, umbrellas, softboxes, ...and a partridge in a pear tree...
He was stating that the 20D has less noise so there was less reason to use a noise reducing program.
It's understandable that noise reduction is less of an issue with the 20D. (But sharpening is still needed for any digicam, and that's the CSpro plug-in's primary raison d'être)
Supported by: Benro C-298 Flexpod tripod, MC96 monopod, Induro PHQ1 head
Also play with: studio strobes, umbrellas, softboxes, ...and a partridge in a pear tree...
I'm using it on Photoshop Elements 3.0.
Did I say "WOW" yet?
www.neatimage.com
A quick sample of what Neat Image can do is in this thread.
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."-Hunter S.Thompson