A Shot from saturdays wedding

cwphotos · September 12, 2006

First one to get black and whited. Shot 1300 shots between my secondary and I. Comments?

gluwater · September 12, 2006

1300? That's it?

I think it looks pretty good but I would have liked to see less wall on the right and not have their legs cut off. Did you take any vertical shots of them there? I like your pose and location.

PeterGar · September 12, 2006

It looks great. The blowing veil and all. What lens and settings? Any other post than BW convert?

cwphotos · September 12, 2006

It was my 17-40 and I cant see the exif right now. I can update later.

Swartzy · September 12, 2006

I love the setting
It looks as though I were walking up from the right and spotted them kissing. The extra part of the wall on right I think adds beauty to the shot...just my opinion. I really like the comp. Would love to see more. Always a student. Thanks for sharing.

stephiewilliams · September 12, 2006

cw - I agree with the first poster about the legs. However what can you do when it is so candid and unposed (or at least looks like it was)...love the shot though.

Scott_Quier · September 12, 2006

cwphotos wrote:

It was my 17-40 and I cant see the exif right now. I can update later.

EXIF grabbed right out of the photo. The browser I use can do that sometimes. Depends on where the photo is hosted, I guess.

Orientation of image: 1
File change date and time: 2006:09:11 20:11:08
Image input equipment manufacturer: Canon
Image input equipment model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Exposure time: 0.0166667
F number: 4
Exposure program: 2
ISO speed rating: 100
Shutter speed: 5.90689
Aperture: 4
Exposure bias: 0
Metering mode: 5
Flash: 9
Lens focal length: 21
Focal plane X resolution: 3954.23
Focal plane Y resolution: 3958.76
Focal plane resolution unit: 2
Custom rendered: 0
Exposure mode: 0
White balance: 1
Scene capture type: 0

Ann McRae · September 12, 2006

Hey Dean...when did you take the plunge into weddings???

I really like this photo - I do agree with Nick (little Nick -

) about wanting to see a vertical shot, but I love the setting and pose, I love the blowing veil and the exposure. Great stuff!!!

I thought about you when we were in Canmore last weekend. i got left behind on a hike (couldn't keep up) so had to look out for myself for bears and cougars...wondered how you'd feel in that situation

In any case, lovely photo - really has a mood to it.

ann

gluwater · September 12, 2006

Ann McRae wrote:

I do agree with Nick (little Nick - )

Hey!:toni

Ann McRae wrote:

I thought about you when we were in Canmore last weekend. i got left behind on a hike (couldn't keep up) so had to look out for myself for bears and cougars...wondered how you'd feel in that situation

cwphotos · September 13, 2006

Ann McRae wrote:

Hey Dean...when did you take the plunge into weddings???

I really like this photo - I do agree with Nick (little Nick - ) about wanting to see a vertical shot, but I love the setting and pose, I love the blowing veil and the exposure. Great stuff!!!

I thought about you when we were in Canmore last weekend. i got left behind on a hike (couldn't keep up) so had to look out for myself for bears and cougars...wondered how you'd feel in that situation

In any case, lovely photo - really has a mood to it.

ann

. Thanks Ann. This is only my second as primary photographer and I will be doing one this weekend as a secondary. Yeah this summer has been bad for me, no bears but plenty of ticks.....and you cant see them things coming.... :uhoh

I hope to post more soon. Oh and Scott, how can I look at the EXIF like that. How did you do that?

Scott_Quier · September 16, 2006

cwphotos wrote:

. Thanks Ann. This is only my second as primary photographer and I will be doing one this weekend as a secondary. Yeah this summer has been bad for me, no bears but plenty of ticks.....and you cant see them things coming.... :uhoh

I hope to post more soon. Oh and Scott, how can I look at the EXIF like that. How did you do that?

At the time I was using the Opera browser (http://www.oprea.com, it's a free download). Right-click on the photo, select image properties. LIke I said, works for some hosts but not for SmugMug. I think SM strips it out of the processed shots (Th, S, M, L) but retains it in the original (O) version (I just checked to make sure).