Skylight filter...to be or not to be
Swartzy
Registered Users Posts: 3,293 Major grins
This discussion may have taken place in the past, so if a thread exists, send me there. Otherwise, I would like your take on if you use a skylight filter on your lenses or not. The reason I'm asking is I realize the benefits of protecting the lens glass but in the same respect it adds yet one more layer of glass. Do you recommend them or not? I've always kept them on all my lenses but am thinking the sharpness and clarity could suffer as a result of using them. I'm aware that there are quality issues associated with each, so for sake of discussion, let's say I have the German Promaster $79.00 skylight (I hate dealers/stealers).
What say ye oh photo ones?
Thanks
What say ye oh photo ones?
Thanks
Swartzy:
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
0
Comments
To ensure that there are as few interferrences as possible, I purchase the highest quality filter...usually B+W.
I, personally do not use a protective UV filter for genral use. If I was shooting near a lot of blowing sand I might, and if I was shooting around the ocean or chemical spray I certainly would. It is easy to use a lens brush to remove dust from a lens surface, but removing deposits that has adhered after a liquid solution has evaporated I prefer to avoid if possible.
I prefer to use lens hoods to protect my lenses. I DO NOT go anywhere without a lens hood, unless my lens is capped with a protective cap. I had a friend who did not use a lens hood on a 16-35 f2.8 L in Antelope Canyon, and ended up with a nice bog scratch on the frontal lens element.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
http://www.digitalgrin.com/showthread.php?t=38917
This is exactly what I was looking for. Perfect. Good information and opinions. I've got them on all lenses (always have) and do use lens hoods from time to time (need one for my 28-135 IS). Thanks again for the info!
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
there was also this thread: http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=39576
And, one more bit of info, on DPReview (and possibly here) someone linked to some pictures w/ very odd background blur which looked a bit like diagonal patterns which was attributed to the filter. I had actually seen this on some of my shots and, since I've removed the filter, I haven't had the problem again. Granted, it was a cheap filter, so its back to "you get what you pay for".
http://mkress65.zenfolio.com
http://mkress65.smugmug.com
I've saved myself trouble by keeping one when I shoot nightlife here in Las Vegas. People spill drinks all the time and they're too drunk to know whats going on. I had someone talk and accidently spit on my lens before, granted yes she was drunk and its not her fault, I was lucky enough to remember to leave my filter on. I had to run the filter in water to clean it properly (her drink must have been mixed with something sugary) and you can't do that with your lens.
So overall, its much like wearing a seatbelt at all times. You could be driving from a block away from your house and not wear a belt but if you ever get hit you would have wished you would have had it on. Same with the filter, wear it at all times and you the benefits outweighs the drawbacks (if any exists).
Thats my opinion.