New Backup Device

Comments

  • gluwatergluwater Registered Users Posts: 3,599 Major grins
    edited September 26, 2006
    It is a great advance over DVD but I'll wait a year or two so the drives can be tested in the real world and the prices drop substantially. Plus this should not be your only back up.
    Nick
    SmugMug Technical Account Manager
    Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
    nickwphoto
  • SpeshulEdSpeshulEd Registered Users Posts: 341 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    I just read the other day that another company (think it might have been samsung) had actually built disc that is actually a 3 in 1. The disc will have blu ray and hd-dvd on one side, and normal dual layer dvd on the other.

    new technology is always fun, but i'm going to wait for it to catch up with itself. I'm sure soon enuf you'll be able to find the combo burner for $50 just like dvd burners today.
    bored? check out my photo site...and if you have the time, leave a comment or rate some pictures while you're there.
    Canon 20D | Canon 17-40mm f/4L USM | Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di LD IF | Canon 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
  • BendrBendr Registered Users Posts: 665 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    SpeshulEd wrote:
    I just read the other day that another company (think it might have been samsung) had actually built disc that is actually a 3 in 1. The disc will have blu ray and hd-dvd on one side, and normal dual layer dvd on the other.
    I'm confused, what is the purpose in that?

    Why would you want to carry arround a regular dvd, if you are using hd-dvd? I would think you would just cary around the one you use, if you needed another interface, you would buy a seperate disk. Or am I misunderstanding? I assume it acts like seperate disks super glued together(not literally)?

    Ben
  • SpeshulEdSpeshulEd Registered Users Posts: 341 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    its kind of like the when dvds first came out and they were double sided, widescreen on one side, fullscreen on the other. With this, one side will be HD, while the other is regular dvd.

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/18/threes-company-warner-patents-all-in-one-hybrid-disc/

    It could be a good idea, it could be a waste...I myself think I'll be looking more into HD DVD as Blu-Ray is Sony, and I'm not the biggest fan of their propriety issues they have on every single thing they make.
    Bendr wrote:
    I'm confused, what is the purpose in that?

    Why would you want to carry arround a regular dvd, if you are using hd-dvd? I would think you would just cary around the one you use, if you needed another interface, you would buy a seperate disk. Or am I misunderstanding? I assume it acts like seperate disks super glued together(not literally)?

    Ben
    bored? check out my photo site...and if you have the time, leave a comment or rate some pictures while you're there.
    Canon 20D | Canon 17-40mm f/4L USM | Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di LD IF | Canon 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
  • claudermilkclaudermilk Registered Users Posts: 2,756 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    Meh. Like many others, I'll wait for the VHS vs Beta Round 2 battle to settle before making a jump. I won't trust this for backups either, I have little confidence that the new, higher-density variation will be any more reliable than current burnable optical media.
  • marklarry28marklarry28 Registered Users Posts: 69 Big grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    This is only starting.

    Blu-Ray should be able to burn DVDs with 200GB.
    The great thing of this is... others will launch their technology as well and then we will decide what is our needsmwink.gif
    Mark
    Canon
  • mr peasmr peas Registered Users Posts: 1,369 Major grins
    edited September 27, 2006
    I remember when the first CD-ROM burners came out. Boyyy those were expensive! But it paid off when you had a PSX, Laughing.gif. Then the DVD burners came out, then the dual-layer, now theyre all super cheap.

    But yeah, I cant wait until they come out and more companies begin building them. I'd back up everything I rarely use on those. Especially photos more than a year old, store them up on disks and put them on a box/shelf somewhere.

    ;)
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited September 30, 2006
    mr peas wrote:
    I remember when the first CD-ROM burners came out. Boyyy those were expensive! But it paid off when you had a PSX, Laughing.gif. Then the DVD burners came out, then the dual-layer, now theyre all super cheap.

    But yeah, I cant wait until they come out and more companies begin building them. I'd back up everything I rarely use on those. Especially photos more than a year old, store them up on disks and put them on a box/shelf somewhere.

    ;)
    Then you need to be sure you don't forget about them being on the shelf. The burnable media do have a shelf-life (no pun intended here) and they need to be refreshed in a periodic basis - that means you need to burn a new copy (maybe more than one of each?) every couple of years.
  • ESigginsESiggins Registered Users Posts: 185 Major grins
    edited October 3, 2006
    To be honest, these advances make me nervous. I'm always afraid that my backups will become obsolete. I still wish I had some of those old PC games I used to carry around on 5" floppy. :cry
    Shoot, or shoot not. There is no try.
    http://esiggins.smugmug.com
Sign In or Register to comment.