Surf City!
ian408
Administrators Posts: 21,948 moderator
Forget HB, it's all Santa Cruz baby...It was supposed to be 70(f) over in
Santa Cruz. I thought I'd swing on by and catch some surf shots. Bzzt. It
was about 50(f) and overcast.
I clearly need more practice at this because the frame after this shows very
clear air--but is out of focus.
I swung the camera around to catch these folks enjoying the contest...
Any advice would be very, very welcome!
Ian
P.S. Could we add a sports category?
Santa Cruz. I thought I'd swing on by and catch some surf shots. Bzzt. It
was about 50(f) and overcast.
I clearly need more practice at this because the frame after this shows very
clear air--but is out of focus.
I swung the camera around to catch these folks enjoying the contest...
Any advice would be very, very welcome!
Ian
P.S. Could we add a sports category?
Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
0
Comments
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
too slow (or I should shoot with a tripod).
ian
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
that....for about one or two shots in really bright light
Light condition was constantly changing. The guy standing next to me had a rain
cover over his camera But he was shooting w/heavy pod and a dampened head.
That would have made panning easier.
But yes, f13 is too slow for that. I tried multiple combinations of ss, iso and ap to
find something that "worked".
Check out this head shot...
This actually was hand-held. Had to pick it all up to swing over for the shot.
Ian
If you have the aperture set to f/13, the camera still uses the max aperture (whatever that is) to actually focus; it doesn't stop down to f/13 until just before tripping the shutter. (I'm not aware of any 500mm f/13 lenses, so I assume the stated aperture was what the camera was set to, not the max aperture of the lens.)
Cheers,
Jeremy
Jeremy Rosenberger
Zeiss Ikon, Nokton 40mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.2, Nokton 50mm f/1.5, Canon Serenar 85mm f/2
Canon Digital Rebel XT, Tokina 12-24mm f/4, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.4
http://ubergeek.smugmug.com/
are wrong for the shot. I would have been better off more open.
You're right, the settings are exposure settings.
Ian
Check out this head shot...
he certainly has quite a head on him...
This actually was hand-held. Had to pick it all up to swing over for the shot.
Ian[/QUOTE]
Longitude: 145° 08'East
Canon 20d,EFS-60mm Macro,Canon 85mm/1.8. Pentax Spotmatic SP,Pentax Super Takumars 50/1.4 &135/3.5,Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Takumars 200/4 ,300/4,400/5.6,Sigma 600/8.
With that good of light, I wouldn't bother with a tripod. I would, however, crank the speed up as high as you can (personally, I'd shoot for 1/1000 minimum). Maybe, widen the aperture up a bit too.
Yep, you're doggone right about Surf City being in NorCal. Who ever heard of Huntington Beach?
A few weekend's ago my wife dropped me off at the Lighthouse and let me shoot for 15 minutes while she circled (as usual, no parking available on the weekend). Anyhow, I got some decent results at from 226-500mm, handheld. Had that bright afternoon Sun off to my 2 o'clock, but I'm still pretty happy with the results I got :-)
Here are a few:
http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/36855042
http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/37051397
http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/36857243
http://www.pbase.com/slo2k/image/36857732
I need to go back when I can shoot a whole MD full of images Good luck on your next shoot :-)
Steve
ian
If you are metering with a typical averaging light meter, I suspect that the white water in the waves could use +1 stop of exposure compensation so that the waves aren't so grey and underexposed. I think that is what you are saying aren't you?
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Any way, the second in the series is blurred. I think it's because of the
shutter/aperture combination.
Ian