Canon 50mm f/1.8 MK1 - MACRO????

sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
edited October 19, 2006 in Holy Macro
50mm 1.8 MK1 cult member here....

take the lens off and reverse it on the body. The nifty 50 actually makes one hell of a macro lens!! At f/1.8 there's no problem seeing your subject in the viewfinder :)

A quarter fills the entire frame!! This was handheld in poor light. Notice the edges are real real soft... lets stop it down!!!

f/1.8
IMG_2746s.JPG
full...f/1.8
http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2746.JPG

You can set the camera to manual, adjust the aperture, hold the aperture preview button, then remove the lens while the button is pressed to keep the aperture closed after the lens is taken off.

f/4 ... better
IMG_2769s.JPG
full...f/4
http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2769.JPG

Check out the IQ on f/11... handheld 1/80th no flash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! shocked.gif

IMG_2772s.JPG
full...f/11
http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2772.JPG

f/18 iso 800 for the heck of it...- what time is it???
IMG_2781s.JPG
full...f/18
http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2781.JPG

without a ring light, external flash+offshoe, or some better constant lighting then an IKEA expresso mini desk light.. f/18 was a bit noisey (See below). A tripod would work well too... but I think this clearly shows the reverse lens capabilities of the nifty fifty. The 35mm F/2 should have even more zoom, and will get tested later this week when I have a chance. I have heard of people hack apart extra body caps and gluing a filter ring on backwards so you can screw the lens on the body. I have a hoya 1b skylight filter on the thing now, and the damn thing fits snug into the little body mount like its supposed to be there!! Pretty sweet actually.
100% crop

IMG_2779.JPG


the same results can be had with the $80 elcheao cheapest of the cheapest canon lenses! 80 BUCKS!!! Who needs a $900 65mm lens anyways? :clap

Comments

  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited October 19, 2006
    Excellent shots- Love the DIY approach to macro :)
    Not certain but you may have problems with a 35mm reversed lens with the focus point being too close to the lens.
    Brian V.
  • sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 19, 2006
    Brian,

    I have used my 17-85mm IS lens for reverse shots before at 17mm... focus is paper thin... well maybe even less than paper. I managed to capture about 1/4 if a mosquito eye in focus! HAH!
  • SkippySkippy Registered Users Posts: 12,075 Major grins
    edited October 19, 2006
    sirsloop wrote:
    50mm 1.8 MK1 cult member here....

    take the lens off and reverse it on the body. The nifty 50 actually makes one hell of a macro lens!! At f/1.8 there's no problem seeing your subject in the viewfinder :)
    A quarter fills the entire frame!! This was handheld in poor light. Notice the edges are real real soft... lets stop it down!!!
    f/1.8
    full...f/1.8
    http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2746.JPG
    You can set the camera to manual, adjust the aperture, hold the aperture preview button, then remove the lens while the button is pressed to keep the aperture closed after the lens is taken off.
    f/4 ... better
    full...f/4
    http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2769.JPG
    Check out the IQ on f/11... handheld 1/80th no flash!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! shocked.gif
    full...f/11
    http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2772.JPG
    f/18 iso 800 for the heck of it...- what time is it???
    full...f/18
    http://www.jdhaesloop.com/IMG_2781.JPG

    without a ring light, external flash+offshoe, or some better constant lighting then an IKEA expresso mini desk light.. f/18 was a bit noisey (See below). A tripod would work well too... but I think this clearly shows the reverse lens capabilities of the nifty fifty. The 35mm F/2 should have even more zoom, and will get tested later this week when I have a chance. I have heard of people hack apart extra body caps and gluing a filter ring on backwards so you can screw the lens on the body. I have a hoya 1b skylight filter on the thing now, and the damn thing fits snug into the little body mount like its supposed to be there!! Pretty sweet actually.
    100% crop
    the same results can be had with the $80 elcheao cheapest of the cheapest canon lenses! 80 BUCKS!!! Who needs a $900 65mm lens anyways? clap.gif

    Nice informative post, couldnt even see that HI engraving till the last shot, its pretty tiny isnt it......... I want Brian to will me his lens when he dies hahahaha .......the reversal stuff looks great but it's still fiddley.
    The thing that bothers me is the worry of accidently damaging the back of the lens when it's reversed by getting too close to something.

    Its always fun to experiment, you got great results there too thumb.gif
    Thanks for sharing your findings and images ...... Skippy (Australia)
    .
    Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"

    ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/

    :skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
  • sirsloopsirsloop Registered Users Posts: 866 Major grins
    edited October 19, 2006
    heh heh... i cut the hi mom in there for the last shot. Its still super small if you compare it to the lettering on a quarter. This is definitly a cool way to get a "macro" shot... but picking up a set of kenko extension tubes will get you the same results...
Sign In or Register to comment.