Name and price this lens
Seen at a local sports game - please name and estimate the purchase price of this lens fitted to the Canon camera. :barb
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nzphotopro1/284542358/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nzphotopro1/284542358/
0
Comments
looks like a 300 f2.8 to me, but I'm not a canonist
I'd guess a 400 f2.8 Not long enough for a 500 f4.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Sure?
Well, why not, but 400's pretty big, too… at least we know this is a big lens
If so, that lens is around $5300 USD.
The lens Pathfinder mentioned is around $6600, and the one Antoine mentioned is around $3900.
What do we win if we're right?
Bruce, are you stalking Catto again?
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
That's kind of what I'm thinking. I've only played with the 300/2.8IS personally & that hood looks about the same, but the lens seems a bit too long for the 300.
http://www.chrislaudermilkphoto.com/
and the price? About $4K pristine, mabye $4.5K
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
nice piece of gear, indeed
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
Nah, that's Marty, he's a local freelance sports photographer. But a good one! (And no, he's not that tall. Sorry Marty!)
I'm not going to rule it out, but I only know of two 200mm f/1.8 lenses in Wellington; so unless he's borrowed one of those - which is possible - I'm thinking it would be either the 300 or 400 mentioned above.
That being the case, I'm not going to speculate on cost; but you can usually find NZ prices on Canon gear at http://www.progear.co.nz/...
R
p.s. you could have just asked him! He was, after all, standing right there when you took the picture...
Seatoun, Wellington New Zealand
http://www.catto.co.nz
That was my thought....Why didn't you just ask him??
I am shy quite person in public...but still I can go ask another photog what he is shooting and why.....most I have run into really like to talk about their gear, especially when your gear is not as "pro" as far as they are concerned.......
Stalking who - no - Wellington is so small we just end up at the same events all the time.
One extremely good photography I met once told me to [FONT="]imamate the people with the best cameras, look at their photos and learn from their expertise. However a us$5K lens is a little out of my budget right now. Shame.
Actually I think Robert Catto's photograpy is great and some of his shots are incredible.
[/FONT]
Actually, looking more closely, see how much white tube space there is between his hand and the tripod / monopod mount of the lens? I'm going to say this is the 300/2.8 - with a 1.4x or 2x teleconverter on it. Anyone like to second that nomination?
R
Seatoun, Wellington New Zealand
http://www.catto.co.nz
That is a very large lens hood.
Bigger than the 300f2.8 and the 400 f4 DO, I believe (which use the same lens hood as Ziggy said.)
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
I've had a 200mm 1.8 for a few years now and it's a great lens. I don't recognise the tripod ring connection as that of the 200. A 1.4 or 2 seems to be fitted.
No more production so your looking second hand.
I'm with you on 'Catto's' photography....
I'm also struggling to keep a whole host of joke's and comments to myself...
Bod.
Jerry Lodriguss - Sports Photographer
Reporters sans frontières
Good to hear it and I quite agree.
ziggy53
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums