Flash Off-Camera

padupadu Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
edited November 6, 2006 in People
Here's my first experiment with an old minolta flash mounted on a reflective umbrella. I appreciate comments as I'm trying to make a personal portraits photobook and I'm eager to learn portrait techniques. Thanks!

105586515-L.jpg
http://padu.merlotti.com
http://padu.smugmug.com
www.merlotti.com
Sony dslr A100, Minolta Maxxum 7000, Voighlander Bessa R and Calumet 4x5 View Camera

Comments

  • DoctorItDoctorIt Administrators Posts: 11,951 moderator
    edited November 3, 2006
    the color balance looks a bit green to me on this monitor (I'm guessing a simple curves, white point adjustment would fix this easily), but as far as lighting/exposure, you've done very well! Great catchlights in the eyes, and good shadows. thumb.gif
    Erik
    moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]


  • padupadu Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
    edited November 3, 2006
    DoctorIt wrote:
    the color balance looks a bit green to me (on this monitor), but as far as lighting/exposure, you've done very well! Great catchlights in the eyes, and good shadows. thumb.gif

    My first mistake was to take the picture in her bedroom (which is all green :D). I had to use a mask on her face to correct it a bit, but I guess some color cast is still present... I was mainly concerned with the skin tone. I'm not sure if I got it right.
    http://padu.merlotti.com
    http://padu.smugmug.com
    www.merlotti.com
    Sony dslr A100, Minolta Maxxum 7000, Voighlander Bessa R and Calumet 4x5 View Camera
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited November 3, 2006
    padu wrote:
    My first mistake was to take the picture in her bedroom (which is all green :D). I had to use a mask on her face to correct it a bit, but I guess some color cast is still present... I was mainly concerned with the skin tone. I'm not sure if I got it right.
    Just a few comments to try to help:
    • Exposure looks good to me.
    • Color cast - shoot raw, shoot a gray card for WB setting then set your custom WB or use the gray card shot in PP to set the WB.
    • Shadows on her left (our right) - get a white foam-core board as a reflector and place it to camera right to reflect a little light back to fill some of that shadow. Regulate the fill by placing the board either closer or farther from the girl.
  • padupadu Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
    edited November 3, 2006
    Just a few comments to try to help:
    • Exposure looks good to me.
    • Color cast - shoot raw, shoot a gray card for WB setting then set your custom WB or use the gray card shot in PP to set the WB.
    • Shadows on her left (our right) - get a white foam-core board as a reflector and place it to camera right to reflect a little light back to fill some of that shadow. Regulate the fill by placing the board either closer or farther from the girl.

    I bought that whitebal gray card now. Haven't used indoors yet, but in my recent trip to NY it's been proven very useful. (I always shoot RAW).
    Thanks for the fill light tip. I had the side of a white piece of furniture on the shadow's side, but I guess it should be closer to her in this photo. I'll buy one of those collapsible circular reflectors for fill light.
    http://padu.merlotti.com
    http://padu.smugmug.com
    www.merlotti.com
    Sony dslr A100, Minolta Maxxum 7000, Voighlander Bessa R and Calumet 4x5 View Camera
  • OwenOwen Registered Users Posts: 948 Major grins
    edited November 3, 2006
    I don't think this requires any fill. The modeling on her face is gorgeous and you lit it very well. It looks like window light. Beautiful portrait.
  • JenGraceJenGrace Registered Users Posts: 1,229 Major grins
    edited November 3, 2006
    I love her little pose, and I think the lighting and shadows are complimentary and nicely done. The only improvement I would make would be to not crop so high (like maybe include just a bit of her torso and the rest of her chopped off elbows). The hat makes it look a little off. Other than that, I like it! clap.gif
    Jen

    Gallery of mine...caution, it's under CONSTANT construction! | Photo Journal

    In the right light, at the right time, everything is extraordinary. ~Aaron Rose
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,703 moderator
    edited November 3, 2006
    Lovely lighting, but ever so slightly green. A faint magenta photo filter in PS should help with that.

    I might have preferred just a tiny smidge more light from her left to create a little catchlight in her left eye. Just a smidge.

    I might have considered a portrait framing, rather than a landscape framing also.

    Lovely pose of a real cutie!!
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • JimMJimM Registered Users Posts: 1,389 Major grins
    edited November 4, 2006
    Absolutely adorable!!!

    The key to kids is the expression, and this one is priceless!
    Cameras: >(2) Canon 20D .Canon 20D/grip >Canon S200 (p&s)
    Glass: >Sigma 17-35mm,f2.8-4 DG >Tamron 28-75mm,f2.8 >Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro >Canon 70-200mm,f2.8L IS >Canon 200mm,f2.8L
    Flash: >550EX >Sigma EF-500 DG Super >studio strobes

    Sites: Jim Mitte Photography - Livingston Sports Photos - Brighton Football Photos
  • NordicNordic Registered Users Posts: 237 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2006
    Wow, what a great portrait, and perfect lightning! clap.gif

    Well done!!

    Kind Regards,
    Andreas
  • padupadu Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2006
    JimM wrote:
    Absolutely adorable!!!

    The key to kids is the expression, and this one is priceless!

    I know, I'm absolutely in love with her :D
    http://padu.merlotti.com
    http://padu.smugmug.com
    www.merlotti.com
    Sony dslr A100, Minolta Maxxum 7000, Voighlander Bessa R and Calumet 4x5 View Camera
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,078 moderator
    edited November 6, 2006
    Padu,

    I am a bit distracted by the color tint as well. I hope you don't mind, but I thought I'd try a BW conversion.

    This is a simple grayscale conversion, with a bit more Contrast and Gamma. I also cropped to 8x10 and that created a distracting dark region on the right that I managed in PShop. A slightly larger border/mat, and I think I like it a lot. (I will remove if you wish.)

    ziggy53
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • padupadu Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2006
    ziggy53 wrote:
    Padu,

    I am a bit distracted by the color tint as well. I hope you don't mind, but I thought I'd try a BW conversion.

    This is a simple grayscale conversion, with a bit more Contrast and Gamma. I also cropped to 8x10 and that created a distracting dark region on the right that I managed in PShop. A slightly larger border/mat, and I think I like it a lot. (I will remove if you wish.)

    ziggy53

    Hi Ziggy,

    I liked the BW conversion!

    Now I had the (mis)understanding that contrast and gamma were the same thing. What's the difference between them?
    http://padu.merlotti.com
    http://padu.smugmug.com
    www.merlotti.com
    Sony dslr A100, Minolta Maxxum 7000, Voighlander Bessa R and Calumet 4x5 View Camera
  • photogmommaphotogmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,644 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2006
    I definitely would like to see more light on her left, our right. She's such a beautiful girl that she could really benefit from it. I don't think it needs to be a ton, but something to bring her face out of shadow a bit.

    I love the greyscale conversion and might want to see a bit more contrast on it.

    I would also love a lower and a vertical crop on this. Or at least a square crop. Too much hat and not enough arms, IMHO.

    This is a great first shot! You're getting me excited to try something like this... Ack! Just what I need - more equipment! Laughing.gif!

    Great job! Adorable girl!
  • OwenOwen Registered Users Posts: 948 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2006
    Why is everyone saying "less shadows"?

    Light is highlight and shadow. Shadows are artistic. This is a beautiful portrait. The shadows are not overpowering. If there were less shadows, it would appear flat.
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,078 moderator
    edited November 6, 2006
    Padu,

    I looked for a site that had a decent explanation of Contrast and Gamma, but couldn't find one.

    The best way to show the difference is through the Curves function of PhotoShop, which can provide both Contrast and Gamma in a single control.

    Gamma is a method of affecting the middle tones of an image, without having much impact on shadows and highlights.

    Contrast works on shadows and highlights, without much imapct on middle tones.

    Here is the original image in Gray Scale. Note that no Curves have been applied (straight line in the Curves dialog window).

    108469202-O.jpg

    Here is just increased Gamma:
    108469313-O.jpg

    Here is just increased Contrast:
    108469381-O.jpg

    Is this starting to make sense?

    P.S. The "Levels" function of PhotoShop is supposed to be a Gamma type control, but it apparently has something called "Slope Limiting" which prevents a true linear capability, and can crush the shadows and possibly burn the highlights.

    The Curves function apparently has no such limitation or problem.

    ziggy53
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Sign In or Register to comment.