Mountain goats and eagles.... Oh, and why I love RAW!

photogmommaphotogmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,644 Major grins
edited November 19, 2006 in Wildlife
Well, I finally figured out why my photos of animals really aren't that great. It's not so much that I suck, it's that my lens does. I read some reviews (it was a gift so I didn't read them before I got it) and it turns out that it's quite soft and slow. Bummer. (It's my Canon 75-300mm USM IS.) But you know what? It's better than nuthin'! LOL!

Anyway, on my way to the grocery store a few weeks ago - the day after I got my new 5D - I noticed some eagles off to the side. I've shot them a few times, but really liked the ones I got this time. Certainly not amazing, but still much better than what I'd gotten before. Unfortunately, I had my camera set completely wrong and didn't know it until AFTER the bird flew away. Thank goodness I use RAW and I was able to recover the image quite a bit! (I had my WB set wrong and it was set on auto instead of AV or TV.)

110800630-S.jpg
Whoops! Before Lightroom and adjustments.

110800644-S.jpg
After! Much nicer, eh? Still not perfect, but.... I should probably crop, but wanted to show the full image.

Anyway, a few others I got along the way:
110808738-M.jpg
The eagle posing for me. :D


110808767-M.jpg
And here's Mr Mountain Goat posing for me....:wink


110808748-M.jpg
And here they are together! (The eagle is in the upper right hand corner.) :ivar

LOL! I love where I live! Pictures have no way of doing it justice!

Thanks for peeking!

Comments

  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited November 16, 2006
    Good set Andi. thumb.gif 300mm is about the shortest difference practicable for wildlife shooting and there's no crop factor on the 5D either.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • GaleGale Registered Users Posts: 1,052 Major grins
    edited November 16, 2006
    Distance is all of our prob:<(((
    A pic of an Eagle is always a keeper.
    I rather like seeing them in thier habitat.
    Nice
    Love the treatment on the last one.
    Cool:>)))
    Best Regards
    Gale

    www.pbase.com/techwish
  • Ric GrupeRic Grupe Registered Users Posts: 9,522 Major grins
    edited November 16, 2006
    Well....I have to agree about the 75-300....mine is sitting in the bag. I guess I should get it out....might be useful as a paper weight!rolleyes1.gif

    Personally, I think the 30D is better suited to these wildlife shots because of the 1.6 fov crop factor and more frames per second. That being said, the 5D would be a kickass landscape tool. Just my opinion.

    I think I could have recovered that same shot if it were a jpeg instead of raw. At least good enough for web display. When shooting wildlife, more shots, and a higher frame rate are more important than the ability to massage an image in post. That is, unless you can get them to pose like Harry does.wings.gif

    Man, I'm full of advice today!rolleyes1.gif


    Beautiful country!thumb.gif
  • photogmommaphotogmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,644 Major grins
    edited November 16, 2006
    Thanks, all! It was fun. I definitely am more of a portrait person, but seeing theses amazing animals just forces me to shoot! Laughing.gif!
    Love the treatment on the last one.

    Thanks! It was so hard to see those teeny tiny goats that I thought it might be fun... It's actually a completely different picture in frame. I was going to do the same with the eagle, but the eagle shot wasn't that much clearer/better than the one you see here.
    Ric Grupe wrote:
    Well....I have to agree about the 75-300....mine is sitting in the bag. I guess I should get it out....might be useful as a paper weight!rolleyes1.gif

    Personally, I think the 30D is better suited to these wildlife shots because of the 1.6 fov crop factor and more frames per second. That being said, the 5D would be a kickass landscape tool. Just my opinion.

    I think I could have recovered that same shot if it were a jpeg instead of raw. At least good enough for web display. When shooting wildlife, more shots, and a higher frame rate are more important than the ability to massage an image in post. That is, unless you can get them to pose like Harry does.wings.gif

    Man, I'm full of advice today!rolleyes1.gif


    Beautiful country!thumb.gif

    Ric, let me know if it works better as a paper weight! Laughing.gif! rolleyes1.gif

    Yeah, FF does mess up that 1.6x factor. It's taken some major getting used to for me! My favorite lens (50mm 1.4) is now about to be second when I get my 85mm.... Laughing.gif! But for what I do, the 5D made sense. Of course, now I want a good zoom. Ugh!

    I only work in RAW because I messed up too many JPGs... Nice ot know that if I set to JPG it might be mostly recoverable, too! :D

    And bring on the advice any time! mwink.gif

    Thanks, again, all!
  • Dick on ArubaDick on Aruba Registered Users Posts: 3,484 Major grins
    edited November 19, 2006
    Nice series, I like the mountain goat.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Dick.
    "Nothing sharpens sight like envy."
    Thomas Fuller.

    SmugMug account.
    Website.
Sign In or Register to comment.