Holiday portrait help

MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
edited November 28, 2006 in People
Tried some family portraits at the beach this weekend for holiday cards. Any thoughts or suggestions on these? Preferences?

113062674-M.jpg

113064772-M.jpg

113070316-M.jpg

113101594-M.jpg

Comments

  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited November 27, 2006
    pretty good, mitch-

    love the last one-

    good looking family, btw-

    cards to send to your northern friends during the winter months?-
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    I prefer the third. The shadows in the flashlit ones are kinda distracting to me. Just my $0.02.
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • binghottbinghott Registered Users Posts: 1,075 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    mitchell, these are excellent. if this were my family i'd be very satisfied with the photos.clap.gif
    i think you did a great job with the lighting.
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    gefillmore wrote:
    pretty good, mitch-

    love the last one-

    good looking family, btw-

    cards to send to your northern friends during the winter months?-

    George,
    The last one is my favorite also, but it's just not holiday card material.ne_nau.gif
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    TristanP wrote:
    I prefer the third. The shadows in the flashlit ones are kinda distracting to me. Just my $0.02.

    Tristan,
    Thanks for looking and commenting on these.

    They are all lit by an off camera flash on a light stand to the camera right. I agree that the shadows are a bit distracting. Any thoughts on how to decrease them in the future? I suspect a second light on the camera left would have helped here. It was already a hassle getting the one light and the rest of my gear out to the beach. I guess I need to hire a sherpa.rolleyes1.gif
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    binghott wrote:
    mitchell, these are excellent. if this were my family i'd be very satisfied with the photos.clap.gif
    i think you did a great job with the lighting.

    Bing,
    Thanks for looking and for your kind comments!
  • kmhkmh Registered Users Posts: 93 Big grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    I love #3 and #4. #1 looks a little less "flashy" than #2...do you think you could crop out and/or clone the shadow to make it less obvious? I know you'd lose the sunset if you cropped, but maybe that would be ok? -Kate
  • JimWJimW Registered Users Posts: 333 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    Mitch,
    I think these shots are wonderful. They should be really happy. #2 is my favorite. On my monitor, the fleshtones look a liitle dark, so I did a quick correction or two to brighten, a quick job. Hope you don't mind.

    Right now I can only think of two ways to deal with that harsh flash. One is to increase the ambient light exp. and decrease the amount of flash (requiring a tripod probably). The other is to soften the flash with a small portable softbox or a shoot-through panel or something like that. (Well, you did say you might get a sherpa. :D)

    But these are minor points. Great job. bowdown.gif

    Jim

    I don't want the cheese, I just want to get out of the trap.


    http://www.jimwhitakerphotography.com/
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    Mitchell wrote:
    Tristan,
    Thanks for looking and commenting on these.

    They are all lit by an off camera flash on a light stand to the camera right. I agree that the shadows are a bit distracting. Any thoughts on how to decrease them in the future? I suspect a second light on the camera left would have helped here. It was already a hassle getting the one light and the rest of my gear out to the beach. I guess I need to hire a sherpa.rolleyes1.gif

    I know what you mean about hauling the lighting gear. I'm certainly no expert, but maybe decrease the ratio between ambient and flash light.
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • JimWJimW Registered Users Posts: 333 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    Well, now I see I should've taken my time and done a better job. Everytime I think I can get away without using a mask, I find I'm wrong. I would still lighten the flesh but without losing the color in the sky like I did.

    Jim

    I don't want the cheese, I just want to get out of the trap.


    http://www.jimwhitakerphotography.com/
  • NanditaNandita Registered Users Posts: 51 Big grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    I love 3 & 4 and think you could use either for your card. #4 evokes such a wonderful, peaceful mood that it doesn't matter that their faces aren't visible.

    If you want the whole family though, I'd go with #2 because the poses and expressions are wonderful. I love the way baby is holding onto mama -- it's a warm, loving photograph and you don't have the distracting sun in the background.

    If you could minimize the shadow/brightness contrast, it'd be just perfect.

    Happy Holidays!
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    JimW wrote:
    Well, now I see I should've taken my time and done a better job. Everytime I think I can get away without using a mask, I find I'm wrong. I would still lighten the flesh but without losing the color in the sky like I did.

    Jim

    Jim,
    Thanks for your efforts. I'll play around with lightening the faces tonight.
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    Nandita wrote:
    I love 3 & 4 and think you could use either for your card. #4 evokes such a wonderful, peaceful mood that it doesn't matter that their faces aren't visible.

    If you want the whole family though, I'd go with #2 because the poses and expressions are wonderful. I love the way baby is holding onto mama -- it's a warm, loving photograph and you don't have the distracting sun in the background.

    If you could minimize the shadow/brightness contrast, it'd be just perfect.

    Happy Holidays!

    I like #4 also, but my wife won't go for it as a holiday card.ne_nau.gif

    #3 is looking like the winner. Another year without my ugly mug on the holiday card.mwink.gif
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited November 27, 2006
    Mitchell wrote:
    I like #4 also, but my wife won't go for it as a holiday card.ne_nau.gif

    #3 is looking like the winner. Another year without my ugly mug on the holiday card.mwink.gif
    Nobody cares about Dad anyway - it's the kids that matter. :D
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited November 28, 2006
    TristanP wrote:
    Nobody cares about Dad anyway - it's the kids that matter. :D


    How true!! nod.gifnod.gifnod.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.