What's your opinion?
I'm not really into people photography, don't ask me why, i'd rather deal with animals... or may be i'm not good with capturing people...
Well, here is couple shots i took while on my cruise. I thought they came out OK. Would like to know what you think. :bow
Well, here is couple shots i took while on my cruise. I thought they came out OK. Would like to know what you think. :bow
0
Comments
It would help to know the exif for these photos, but I'll tell you what I see anyway. These are very nice photographs, very colorful and sharp. Your are right, they did come out OK.
- They need slightly more exposure. It appears that they are about 1/2 - 2/3 stop underexposed - The whites of their costumes appear to be somewhat gray and the faces are a little dark.
For next time : They are a little centered - that is the faces of your subjects are very close to the center of the photographs and with a lot of space above them and without any ankles or feet to walk upon.My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
As far as being centered, i did crop around the photo, there was too much going on on the sides. So, you saying that centered faces are not good?? . Pardon me ignorance, i'm learning as i go.
I'm not sure how whites can come out whiter, camera was on auto and that's how they came out. Got to learn manual mode i guess.
Thanks for your honesty, it helps to see mistakes and try to improve them.
Cheers!
I did crap this a little, and it looks horrible! That bathroom sign drives me crazy!. Photoshop?
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
Very good photos except for the background. If you had moved to the left and had as little as possible in the background, especially people walking and watching, they both would be fine.
Happy New Year.
Darwin, Australia
Nikon D2X, F5, 17-35 AFS f2.8, 50AFD f1.4, 50 AFD f1.8, 85 AFD f1.4, 200 AFS VR f2, SB800, Metz 60-CT1
http://www.bushwalkingholidays.com.au/html/compare.htm
http://www.travelnt.com/en/explore/darwin/
Thank you salazar. I see that you lightened them up a big, they look better.
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
I agree, i was waiting for people to just go away!! Unfortunately, it is a busy place, and i had no time to wait for too long. I'll play with is and see what comes up.
Thank you!
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
To answer the question:
Cameras are stupid when left on their own. They see everything as shades of gray and their favorite shade is 18% gray. And, they like to translate everything they see to this shade. What has happened here is the camera saw some very bright white and said to itself, "That can't be right, let me reduce the exposure so that it makes sense."
The white clothing measures about 2/3 to 1 stop above medium gray, so the clothing looks like it's not ever seen bleach.
You need to counter the computer in your camera, you simply dial in 1/3 to 1 stop of exposure compensation (EC). This tells the camera to take a measurement, then increase the exposure by the EC amount. And the result? You get (just like in the old laundry detergent commercials) whiter whites!
The same rule applies when taking photographs in brightly lit snow or on beaches or anywhere the light is naturally brighter than "normal."
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8