First time in the studio

schmooschmoo Registered Users Posts: 8,468 Major grins
edited January 18, 2007 in People
... for me, not the models, I mean.

A friend was kind enough to introduce me to the basics of studio lighting. Which was very very interesting, as I haven't even got myself a 430X yet! But I think my biggest nitpick would be the difficulty of getting pleasing skin tones, especially with such a bold-colored background.


123508852-O.jpg

123508834-O.jpg

123508847-O.jpg

Comments

  • jdryan3jdryan3 Registered Users Posts: 1,353 Major grins
    edited January 16, 2007
    I like the second one best. Lighting is good, composition is great. The way she is looking over her shoulder into the empty space is very good. Makes you wonder what is in the upper right corner, just out of the frame. thumb.gif
    "Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. Oh well."
    -Fleetwood Mac
  • PhotosbychuckPhotosbychuck Registered Users Posts: 1,239 Major grins
    edited January 16, 2007
    Hi, schmooo

    Great photos clap.gif

    I would like to see her smile in the #3 pose.

    Take Care,
    Charles Cassidy,
    http://www.modellocate.com/action/goto/uid=4447
    D300S, 18-200mm VR, 70-300mm VR

    Aperture Focus Photography
    http://aperturefocus.com
  • imaximax Registered Users Posts: 691 Major grins
    edited January 16, 2007
    Hey Schmooo,

    Great opportunity for you, take advantage of it. I wish I had a friend with a studio, I'm currently looking for a spot to work with someone without spending an arm and a leg, and not having much luck I might add.

    I like the first picture the best. especially the white jacket against the red background. Very Nice.........

    What kind of lights were you using if you do't mind me asking?
  • schmooschmoo Registered Users Posts: 8,468 Major grins
    edited January 17, 2007
    Thanks everyone! I do agree that smiling may have helped in the third, but there were three of us shooting at the same time so I consider myself lucky that I got even one photo of a girl looking at me! :D

    For lights I can't remember the specifics but we had two umbrellas, one on each side and I had a 430X pointed up to the ceiling. Additionally, since it was a regular room converted to a studio, all the normal house lights were on as well. But I think the nice soft light from the umbrellas made the biggest difference.

    I understand that there's much much more to lighting, so I better get to studying and digging a bit deeper in these forums. :)
  • binghottbinghott Registered Users Posts: 1,075 Major grins
    edited January 17, 2007
    these are good! thumb.gif i like the 3rd picture the best, i like the lighting, but i wish the eyes were a little lighter.

    i actually think these all might be a tad underexposed.
  • schmooschmoo Registered Users Posts: 8,468 Major grins
    edited January 18, 2007
    They were a bit underexposed, which surprised me as they looked much brighter than my usual shots when I checked them on the LCD. I'm not sure if it was something as a result of not being used to using flash and other artificial lighting or what. rolleyes1.gif

    But now I know... and knowing is half the battle!
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited January 18, 2007
    schmooo wrote:
    They were a bit underexposed, which surprised me as they looked much brighter than my usual shots when I checked them on the LCD. I'm not sure if it was something as a result of not being used to using flash and other artificial lighting or what. rolleyes1.gif

    But now I know... and knowing is half the battle!
    That's why I have a light meter that will handle both ambient and flash lighting. Then, I use the histogram for the first couple of shots with any new lighting setup and shoot the exposure to the right just a touch. I don't let anything blow, but it may be a tad OE, then I back it off that tad in PP. Works for me, I don't loose highlights, and I don't, usually get any hot spots (though there have been enough exceptions that help to make this a valid rule of thumb!).
  • schmooschmoo Registered Users Posts: 8,468 Major grins
    edited January 18, 2007
    Thanks Scott, that's a great tip! I've never used a light meter before but I always have to remember the importance of the in-camera histogram. Duh! So many tools, not enough grey matter to keep them all out on the table when I'm flustered and shooting. :D
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited January 18, 2007
    schmooo wrote:
    Thanks Scott, that's a great tip! I've never used a light meter before but I always have to remember the importance of the in-camera histogram. Duh! So many tools, not enough grey matter to keep them all out on the table when I'm flustered and shooting. :D
    Yeah, me too. But, I keep trying.
  • primedigitalprimedigital Registered Users Posts: 93 Big grins
    edited January 18, 2007
    schmooo wrote:
    Thanks everyone! I do agree that smiling may have helped in the third, but there were three of us shooting at the same time so I consider myself lucky that I got even one photo of a girl looking at me! :D

    For lights I can't remember the specifics but we had two umbrellas, one on each side and I had a 430X pointed up to the ceiling. Additionally, since it was a regular room converted to a studio, all the normal house lights were on as well. But I think the nice soft light from the umbrellas made the biggest difference.

    I understand that there's much much more to lighting, so I better get to studying and digging a bit deeper in these forums. :)

    Hey Smooo, great shots for a first time. If you are shooting raw (recommended) you can over expose to the point where you are getting blinky lights on your image review and still bring down the exposure (without loosing highlights) in post and end up with a much cleaner file with less noise. Plus you can adjust the white balance after you shoot. Win-Win situation!
    Tracy :photo
    Prime Digital Photography
    Capturing life one fraction of a second at a time
    http://www.primedigitalphotography.com/

    http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=195119389
Sign In or Register to comment.