Canon 17-40mm f/4L Distortion: How bad is it?
And is it correctible in software?
I rented this lens for an event I shot last autumn and instantly fell in love with it. I'm considering investing in it as a workhorse landscape lens, but worry that I wouldn't ever be able to shoot a flat horizon with it without laying bare its achilles heel for all the world to see.
Any experience out there trying to overcome the wide-end barrel distortions present with this lens?
I rented this lens for an event I shot last autumn and instantly fell in love with it. I'm considering investing in it as a workhorse landscape lens, but worry that I wouldn't ever be able to shoot a flat horizon with it without laying bare its achilles heel for all the world to see.
Any experience out there trying to overcome the wide-end barrel distortions present with this lens?
http://www.tylerwinegarner.com
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
0
Comments
Also, Photoshop has lens correction built in. But PTLens reads the EXIF and fixes it without doing much other than opening the plug-in and clicking a button.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Myself, I love that lens.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops