Appreciating Annie Leibovitz
Recently, Lynn asked me offline to critique a portrait of a woman. As part of my critique, I recommended that she study the work of Annie Leibovitz, paticularly a relatively recent book called "Women". This is a coffee table sized book of portraits of women with a forward by Susan Sontag.
Last night and this morning I followed my own advice and spent some time looking at the images in this book and digging around online for other Leibovitz images ("Women" is the only book of hers I have.) As of this morning, Leibovitz is my second favorite living photographer, only after Irving Penn (who might not be working anymore.)
Leibovitz is most famous for images of counterculture figures, particularly rock stars. These are probably familiar images for boomers:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465755-L.jpg
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465749-L.jpg
Probably her most famous image is this, taken just hours before John Lennon was shot:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465767-L.jpg
Here's a group shot of The Greatful Dead:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465751-L.jpg
And Louis:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465750-L.jpg
OK, these are dream gigs for any photographer. You really have to get to the top of the heap before someone will let give you a chance to take a photograph of a subject like this, let alone actually pay you to do it. But, I have to be honest, what would I do with such an opportunity? A lot of times I have to dig around pretty hard to find good shots from situations where I really really wanted to shoot some winners. So at least part of being a pro at this level is not blowing the chances you do get. Here is what Leibovitz did with Michael Jordan for a Vanity Fair cover:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465766-L.jpg
I think it's more interesting when a photographer takes a big opportunity like this and then takes a big risk. The John and Yoko shot was an example of this. Here is another:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465760-L.jpg
Or what about this of David Bryne?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465761-L.jpg
Or Dylan?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465757-L.jpg
OK, OK, I hear you saying, but these are all pictures of men. That's because I was just providing a little historical background. I don't even think the pictures I've shown so far are Leibovitz's best work. So let's look at some of the images from Women.
How do we think this one would have done in our recent portrait challenge?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465737-L.jpg
I think one of the issues we have shooting portraits of women has to do with the tension between "glamor" and "truth". In the shot above, she has found great beauty in a very old woman with no makeup. And here she has done it, this time with makeup:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465777-L.jpg
Like Lynn, we are often caught between taking flattering, glamorous portraits and taking honest pictures. It's magical when someone does both, as in this of Blythe Danner and her daughter Gweneth Paltrow:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465747-L.jpg
OK, these are two very beautiful women, even if Blythe Danner is no spring chicken. Leibovitz can also make much more ordinary women in much more ordinary situations look strikingly beautiful:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465743-L.jpg
She can also present women whose achievements have nothing to do with their looks. Justices O'Conner and Ginsburg:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465745-L.jpg
This picture tells me a lot about these two women who must have a very very complex intellectual relationship. (It makes my head spin to think...) Yet, you can see a lot of it here. Ginsburg's body language is articulate. I think she has to listen to O'Conner a lot and has to process it very carefully. I think she is feels in constant danger of being seduced in some way by her more senior and more charming colleague with whom she has deep philosophical disagreements.
This one would have dated from Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465765-L.jpg
Besides the great use of negative space and color, this picture also tells a lot about an intellectual woman, in this case one cast in some very uncomfortable roles. (Not only was her less than perfect relationship with her husband made very public; she also assumed the first lady role when she herself is a very forceful intellect. She graduated ahead of her husband from Yale Law School.) So she has to look beautiful and she has to be shot in a magnificent setting. But subject and photographer have made sure to present her as an intellectual, and a creative one at that (she is writting, not reading.)
Here is another intellectual woman, this time not a famous one:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465771-L.jpg
She is a rabbinical scholar and I love how her pride in accomplishment and her love of her religion shines through.
Here is Alice Walters, the famous Berkeley, California chef:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465776-L.jpg
Here is a very sensuous woman, though not in a particularly sexual way. Leibovitz has found both glamor and sensuality here far outside the female stereotype. (And talk about negative space!)
She can present the ordinary woman with her family very positively:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465772-L.jpg
And show the victimization of domestic abuse without losing the dignity of her subject:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465775-L.jpg
How does it effect these pictures that the subject is a woman in a typically male role and pose?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465734-L.jpg
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465741-L.jpg
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465770-L.jpg
All threee would be great pictures with male subjects. I would give my eye teeth to have taken one of them. But the female subjects make us look again and thus futher deepen the interest.
Here is a brave use of a great subject:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465746-L.jpg
What would you do with Martina Navratilova if she would pose for you?
I've shown you about 1/2 of the images I was able to find online. The two links I used are:
http://www.temple.edu/photo/photographers/leibovitz/index.html
which shows a timeline of some of Leibovitz's most famous work, and this:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/photos/leibovitz/contact-sheet.html
which is a rather small collection taken from the book "Women". As is often the case, the best online images don't compare to what you get for about $25 if you buy the book. The book is large and the images are printed beautifully and most are full sized. I think the color in the book is also better.
I'm very glad I took the time to appreciate Annie Leibovitz. For those of you who aren't very familiar with her work, I hope this will serve as sufficient introduction for you to learn more. Of course, other opinions are very welcome.
Last night and this morning I followed my own advice and spent some time looking at the images in this book and digging around online for other Leibovitz images ("Women" is the only book of hers I have.) As of this morning, Leibovitz is my second favorite living photographer, only after Irving Penn (who might not be working anymore.)
Leibovitz is most famous for images of counterculture figures, particularly rock stars. These are probably familiar images for boomers:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465755-L.jpg
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465749-L.jpg
Probably her most famous image is this, taken just hours before John Lennon was shot:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465767-L.jpg
Here's a group shot of The Greatful Dead:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465751-L.jpg
And Louis:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465750-L.jpg
OK, these are dream gigs for any photographer. You really have to get to the top of the heap before someone will let give you a chance to take a photograph of a subject like this, let alone actually pay you to do it. But, I have to be honest, what would I do with such an opportunity? A lot of times I have to dig around pretty hard to find good shots from situations where I really really wanted to shoot some winners. So at least part of being a pro at this level is not blowing the chances you do get. Here is what Leibovitz did with Michael Jordan for a Vanity Fair cover:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465766-L.jpg
I think it's more interesting when a photographer takes a big opportunity like this and then takes a big risk. The John and Yoko shot was an example of this. Here is another:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465760-L.jpg
Or what about this of David Bryne?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465761-L.jpg
Or Dylan?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465757-L.jpg
OK, OK, I hear you saying, but these are all pictures of men. That's because I was just providing a little historical background. I don't even think the pictures I've shown so far are Leibovitz's best work. So let's look at some of the images from Women.
How do we think this one would have done in our recent portrait challenge?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465737-L.jpg
I think one of the issues we have shooting portraits of women has to do with the tension between "glamor" and "truth". In the shot above, she has found great beauty in a very old woman with no makeup. And here she has done it, this time with makeup:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465777-L.jpg
Like Lynn, we are often caught between taking flattering, glamorous portraits and taking honest pictures. It's magical when someone does both, as in this of Blythe Danner and her daughter Gweneth Paltrow:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465747-L.jpg
OK, these are two very beautiful women, even if Blythe Danner is no spring chicken. Leibovitz can also make much more ordinary women in much more ordinary situations look strikingly beautiful:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465743-L.jpg
She can also present women whose achievements have nothing to do with their looks. Justices O'Conner and Ginsburg:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465745-L.jpg
This picture tells me a lot about these two women who must have a very very complex intellectual relationship. (It makes my head spin to think...) Yet, you can see a lot of it here. Ginsburg's body language is articulate. I think she has to listen to O'Conner a lot and has to process it very carefully. I think she is feels in constant danger of being seduced in some way by her more senior and more charming colleague with whom she has deep philosophical disagreements.
This one would have dated from Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465765-L.jpg
Besides the great use of negative space and color, this picture also tells a lot about an intellectual woman, in this case one cast in some very uncomfortable roles. (Not only was her less than perfect relationship with her husband made very public; she also assumed the first lady role when she herself is a very forceful intellect. She graduated ahead of her husband from Yale Law School.) So she has to look beautiful and she has to be shot in a magnificent setting. But subject and photographer have made sure to present her as an intellectual, and a creative one at that (she is writting, not reading.)
Here is another intellectual woman, this time not a famous one:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465771-L.jpg
She is a rabbinical scholar and I love how her pride in accomplishment and her love of her religion shines through.
Here is Alice Walters, the famous Berkeley, California chef:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465776-L.jpg
Here is a very sensuous woman, though not in a particularly sexual way. Leibovitz has found both glamor and sensuality here far outside the female stereotype. (And talk about negative space!)
She can present the ordinary woman with her family very positively:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465772-L.jpg
And show the victimization of domestic abuse without losing the dignity of her subject:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465775-L.jpg
How does it effect these pictures that the subject is a woman in a typically male role and pose?
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465734-L.jpg
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465741-L.jpg
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465770-L.jpg
All threee would be great pictures with male subjects. I would give my eye teeth to have taken one of them. But the female subjects make us look again and thus futher deepen the interest.
Here is a brave use of a great subject:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465746-L.jpg
What would you do with Martina Navratilova if she would pose for you?
I've shown you about 1/2 of the images I was able to find online. The two links I used are:
http://www.temple.edu/photo/photographers/leibovitz/index.html
which shows a timeline of some of Leibovitz's most famous work, and this:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/photos/leibovitz/contact-sheet.html
which is a rather small collection taken from the book "Women". As is often the case, the best online images don't compare to what you get for about $25 if you buy the book. The book is large and the images are printed beautifully and most are full sized. I think the color in the book is also better.
I'm very glad I took the time to appreciate Annie Leibovitz. For those of you who aren't very familiar with her work, I hope this will serve as sufficient introduction for you to learn more. Of course, other opinions are very welcome.
If not now, when?
0
Comments
The picture of Justices Ginsburg and O'Conner shows crystal clear facial detail in the book. Same for Hillary Clinton.
Don't want to be a broken record, but this is really a bargain and a must have.
You know it is funny, though, some photographers inspire me, some just make me want to cry. I know I would never make the choices she did in photographing people..........OK, so I am a small person, but I get very jealous.
I remember pouring over those photos of the chef just marveling at her choice to show her as a woman, almost romantic.......was that Vanity fair? Sometimes that is why I buy the magazine.
ginger (No, I don't have her book.........and I don't know if I want it. I do like seeing her in Vanity Fair.) I wanted her book on musicians almost more. Probably because that is not a subject I would screw up, as my association with musicians is very slight.
Awesome post (I'm sure it took some work and time)
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14487369-O.jpg
(Also a thousand times better in the book, where you can see some really brave lighting/focus stuff in the eyes. How do you get those double catch lights?)
There is a picture of HP CEO Carly Fiorina in the book that I can't find online. It took my breath away. She's in deep shadow in the back of her bizjet and the image has a distinct blue cast. She looks tough as nails and very self possessed. There is an inexplicable and very distinct glint in one eye. Nobody has mistaken Ms Fiorina for a Democrat for a good long while. (Do some research.)
Here's The Donald and Ivanna in 1988:
http://rutt.smugmug.com/photos/14465762-O.jpg
I'm not sure of The Donald's politics, but I wanted an excuse to tell a story about this couple. Ivanna was an Olympic skier. The Donald never was and actually wasn't much of a skier at all. They were once spotted skiing together at (where else) Aspen. She was skiing backward in front of him. He was just barely getting down without falling. And she was giving him a piece of her mind.
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
Amazon is selling the paperback of Women for $10 tonight. It is also having a little trouble with my 1-click orders, so perhaps it is just broken. But $10 for this book new is a steal. And it seems to qualify for free shipping.
I'll bet it's just broken.
i was able to get it, $9.99, with one-click. thanks rutt
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Me too. Thanks John!
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
I ordered the Leibowitz book, because last year at this time it was this price, then at one time I wanted it, and I couldn't find it at this price. So I threw in the battery charger, added the book, used one prize money thing, put 2.00 on my debit card.............and I just remembered that.
After I did it, I saw another book I had wanted. It is called Wise Women, I don't remember the photographer's name, it is not one I recognize, but I have liked the concept of the book. So I have to go see where these other sale books are hiding. This is a good time of year to get books that they had hoped to sell at Christmas.
So we can all get together and spill coffee on our Liebowitz books at our new book club. What do you have for next month, Rutt?
ginger
This whole thread is wonderful. You are a gem for doing all this work for us.
Susan Appel Photography My Blog
"women" by annie l arrived in my mailbox today. best $10 i ever spent
thanks again rutt
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
i'll be looking at it later and will report back
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
http://www.powells.com/authors/leibovitz.html
Dave
http://www.lifekapptured.com (gallery)
And, Lynn, I think you got just the right lenses. Next time you might want to go even wider.
I am so acquainted with her work, yes, I am impressed, I can't imagine not being. But there is an old lady, she used to be alive, may be yet, she photographed the south. I am going to try to find one of her books. I remember being very impressed. Maybe we are examining ourselves.
I did notice, and I hate to say anything........well, I will wait, but she and I have something in common, I think. I just see it in her photography, but I certainly don't mean to compare myself as a photographer with her.
ginger
She died a a few years ago.
What an amazing picture. The story of that picture is in the interview and is pretty good.
has anyone seen it?
It is very heavy at Barnes and Noble and covered with cellophane.
I am salivating over it.
Has anyone actually seen it, the book. I have seen the magazine articles, particularly Newsweek.
http://www.amazon.com/Photographers-Life-1990-2005-Annie-Leibovitz/dp/0375505091/sr=8-1/qid=1160065413/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-1088248-6503346?ie=UTF8&s=books
the link to Amazon........came out tuesday. 45.00
ginger